Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Answer: concentration
Homework has this basic purposes: 1) practice 2) preparation 3) study, extend or elaborate, and integrate
Homework aims s to help students to strengthen what they learned in class and also to gather extra information beyond what is thought and integrate them into their everyday lives.
Concentration is not included to the type of homework.
Answer:
prepayment penalty, maintain, insurance, mortgage
Explanation:
Prepayment penalty clause relates to the situation that the borrower shall not prepay the borrowed amount as to the creditor it will be loss in the form of interest, thus, it do not want that the borrower shall collect from any other source.
The property should not loose its value, or the value shall not be degraded as that will result in loss, as when the borrower fails to repay the loan, creditor has the right to sell it, if it will not be maintained the value will degrade.
Insurance is required so that same as in above mentioned point that the value is not lost, and then the value of loan is fully recoverable.
If the value of loan exceeds 80% of value of property there shall be mortgage as the lender ensures his payment and no failure shall be there.
Answer:
$28,000 and $12,000, respectively
Explanation:
Marginal cost = incremental cost from Plan C to Plan D
= total cost (plan D) - total cost (plan C)
= 72,000 - 44,000 = $28,000
Marginal benefit = incremental benefit from Plan C to Plan D
= total benefit (plan D) - total benefit (plan C)
= 64,000 - 52,000 = $12,000
Therefore marginal cost and benefits for Plan D = $28,000 and $12,000, respectively
Answer:
Sarah has invested in sole proprietorship while Jane has invested in corporations
Explanation:
Sole proprietorship is owned and run by a single owner who is legally obligated for all business assets and liabilities. Since Sarah has invested thousands of dollars in one company, it looks like she has invested in sole proprietorship in which she is the owner.
Corporation is run by group of people who are not legally obligated for the assets and liabilities of the corporation. People can invest in more than one corporation as they are open for public offer. These investors earn dividends based on the earnings earned by the corporations So, possibly Jane has invested hundreds of dollars in different large companies.
