Answer:
Qualified business income deduction= $20,000
Explanation:
Section 199A of the Internal Revenue Code gives numerous citizens a conclusion to qualified business salary from a certified exchange or business worked straightforwardly or through a go through substance. People, trusts and bequests with qualified business salary, qualified REIT profits or qualified PTP pay may meet all requirements for the finding. QBI is the net measure of qualified things of salary, addition, derivation and shortfall from any certified exchange or business. The reasoning will be % of QBI.
Tammy shall get deduction of 20% of $ 100,000 = $ 20,000
Answer:
Neoliberalism.
Explanation:
If the inequality is increased so the individual income would be represent as a neoliberalism cause also it would be applied in that case when the soviet union fall witness the disparities that lies between the rich and the power having gap widening also. It affects the individuals those already wealthy in order to earn and make more profits and give less for the population that is poor to catch up and decline back on track
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": changing the culture through diversity training education programs.
Explanation:
Boosting diversity at the workplace is an activity that mainly relies on the representatives of the Human Resources (HR) Department. They are in charge of recruiting and selecting the applicants that will be part of the institution based on their capabilities and expertise. Thus, HR representatives could promote the selection of different individuals from different ages, races, gender, ethnicity, and nationality, without preferring one or another, so the working environment will be diversified and the company can take advantage of the different backgrounds of those new hires.
Therefore, <em>training other employees could improve the understanding of other employees on dealing with workers different than them but this does not foster diversity in the workplace.</em>
These were the choices that I have found based on the question.
A. Jose is right because subordinates often have reliable information about a manager’s behavior toward employees.
B. Fernando is right because subordinates are often willing to say negative things about the person to whom they report.
C. Jose is right because when feedback forms need subordinates’ names on them, the subordinates tend to give lower ratings to the manager.
D. Fernando is right because when managers receive ratings from their subordinates, the employees have less power.
<span>E. Jose is right because subordinate evaluations are most appropriate for strategic purposes.
I believe the answer is E. since subordinates know if the managers are doing their job on being with the company. They are the first-hand information because they are directly managed by their managers. And the effectivity of the subordinates on their roles relies on their manager. Good management is evident if the subordinates have well-disseminated information and function on their specific roles which are all important small or big roles contribute to overall performance. Thus, good performance of subordinates has a reflection of how their manager does his/her work.</span>
