Answer:
i dont know
Step-by-step explanation:
i still dont know
1-r 253 I’m going on a run 1 r to the store and the other slides I gotta was a great full day and
Answer:
Identifying at least one confounding variable that undermines the conclusion drawn in the fictional study is:
All students took the same comprehensive test.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a study, an independent variable causes an effect on the dependent variable. But a confounding variable is the variable that influences the independent variable as well as the dependent variable. If this third variable is not controlled, it might lead the researcher to make a wrong estimate of the relationship that exists between the independent variable and the dependent variable.
Now, to find 'x' you will apply the Null Factor Law. This means you will now let 'x' = 0, and simply move the -2 over to the other side to find your answer. Note: since we are using a perfect square, x will only have one value since there is only one answer (x-2) in the brackets, meaning in this case we can ignore the exponent (as the answers will be the same). If there was more than one answer in the bracket (e.g. (x-4) and (x-6)), then we would apply Null Factor Law to both brackets and solve for x.
(x−2)=5
x=5+2
x=7
Answer:
Data Screening will includes; the followings;
Accuracy:
1. Include output that indicates if the data are or are not accurate.
2. If the data are not accurate, delete the inaccurate scores.
3. Include a summary that shows that you fixed the inaccurate scores.
Missing;
a. Since any accuracy errors will create more than 5% missing data, exclude all data pairwise for the rest of the analyses. ##missing - exclude pairwise, so leave them in. no missing = correldata summary.
