Plessy vs. Ferguson was the case that ruled that segregation laws were acceptable specifically the public facilities under the Separate but Equal doctrine. It was later overturned through court decisions and legislation.
<u>Social disorganization theory</u> can help explain crimes committed by individuals who develop and spread computer viruses.
Social process theories like differential reinforcement theory and learning theory can be used to explain why people who create and propagate computer viruses commit crimes. The ability to write a virus requires a certain amount of technical proficiency. Learning how to write the code required to create a virus is frequently part of this process. Many people learn these skills through message boards, or distance learning instead of in-person instruction, which is the case in the majority of cases. This kind of action also has positive reinforcements, such as the thrill of spreading the virus and infecting systems, "admiration" from one's peer group, and potential financial gains.
According to this theoretical viewpoint, criminal behaviour may be related to missed possibilities for respectable pursuits. As a result, those who engage in this kind of criminal activity could be referred to as "innovators" because they employ unethical methods to achieve the conventional aim of success, which is typically quantified in terms of financial gain. It's interesting to note that Merton first used this theoretical viewpoint to explain why legitimate chances for those who are primarily from the lower class were obstructed.
To learn more about Social disorganization theory here,
brainly.com/question/6346997
#SPJ4
Answer:
a lot of them didn't know they could
Explanation:
Hello there!
President Andrew Jackson, nicknamed "Indian killer" or "sharp knife", was one of our "most racist" presidents. He killed many Indians, and disliked anyone apart from his race; white.
<span>President Andrew Jackson said that “this is a country for white men”, meaning he obviously disliked anyone of color.
Hope this helps you!
~DL
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is : C
a. appropriate, as the quick increase in the frequency of Allie's participation will likely significantly enhance the class's conversation.
b. appropriate, as twenty minutes is a brief time period so Allie won't struggle with the issue of delayed gratification.
c. inadvisable, as the expectation that Allie so quickly make so many comments may lead to anxiety and ultimately cause the plan to fail.
d. inadvisable, as by third grade, Allie should be able to demonstrate self-monitoring over a longer period of time.
Explanation:
In this case, Allie is making many comments so quickly and this situation can cause anxiety because of her shyness so the plan would not have the outcome expected and she may be in a very uncomfortable situation due to her personality. This action wouldn't be recommendable as a good strategy.
