Answer:
d) analogy
Explanation:
Analogy refers to a linguistic comparison of two objects that emphasizes the similarities between those two objects. They are usually used to describe a new concept by comparing it to something that is more familiar to the audience.
In this example, <u>the city planner was giving a speech on sending citizens appropriate text messages regarding city and states issues. To make her point she used the example of the problems that were caused when the state of Hawaii accidentally sent out a text about an incoming missile (which in that time created panic in the population).</u>
Thus, she is trying to <u>make her point by comparing it to a situation that is more familiar (the Hawaii accidental text) to the people she's talking to.</u>
Thus, we can say that she used an analogy.
The answer is: National character.
This term, also known as <em>national stereotype</em> or <em>ethnic stereotype, </em>stands for a conviction that there are some universal characteristics shared by members of a particular group or nationality. For instance, a national stereotype would be a belief that Italians are generally romantic and passionate.
Answer:
gender inequality
Explanation:
in some cultures it is expected for woman to be submissive , they should allow men to control the relationship in whichever way that they want , a woman's voice is not heard enough in this kind of relationship , some are not even allowed to work , they should stay home , Ake care of kids and do all the house chores.
Answer:
spontaneous recovery
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this scenario exemplifies spontaneous recovery. This refers to the re-emergence of a previously believed extinguished conditioned response after a certain delay. This is what seems to have happened to Ronny with his panic attacks.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: The soldier does share responsibility for the crimes of the Holocaust because he did nothing about it. Even if he/she disagreed they did nothing but stay quiet.
