In our analysis of economics and culture, the substantivists argue that sometimes profit motives are alien to non-western societies. Substantivists is a position in which there are two meanings of the word economy. In this case, depending on the situation profit and motives may be motivating and meaningful to different people based on their economic situation.
Answer:
The omnipotence fallacy
Explanation:
The omnipotence paradox or fallacy arise if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome or result and even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. This family of fallacies hinges on the understanding of the word "omnipotent" which is the nature of God.
The most well-known version of the omnipotence paradox is the paradox of the stone "Could God create a stone so heavy that even He could not lift it? This phrasing of the omnipotence paradox is vulnerable to objections based on the physical nature of gravity, such as how the weight of an object depends on what the local gravitational field is. Other statements of the paradox that do not involve such difficulties include "If given the axioms of Euclidean geometry, can an omnipotent being create a triangle whose angles do not add up to 180 degrees?" and "Can God create a prison so secure that he cannot escape from it
Relating this to the question, smart think that they are all powerful and they can do whatever they want and will not come to any harm. This is a case of omnipotent fallacy. He feels all powerful.
And believes that because he exercises, smoking (which is dangerous to health) will not cause him any harm, and hence he shouldn't be in the statistics of smokers.
The correct answer is "processing knowledge may be important as processing land, labor or capital".
Peter Drucker was a famous Austrian management consultant, teacher and author. Peter Drucker's famous writings hold a great effect on philisophical and practical basis of modern ventures and corporations.
