Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Sikhism hope this helped:)
Answer:
To mobilize a nation. Inexpensive, accessible, and ever-present, the poster was an ideal agent for making war aims the personal mission of every citizen
Explanation:
Answer:
Diffusion of responsibility
Explanation:
Diffusion of responsibility is a phenomenon where a person is less likely to take responsibility for action when they are in the presence of a large group of people. This happens because the individual assumes that others are either responsible for taking action or have already done so.
Since they are part of a big group of people, people will tend to assume that someone else will probably help or, if nobody is helping, that the situation is not that serious. Thus, they don't feel pressured to respond.
In this example, Roger was screaming for help as he was being beaten up. There were about 15 people standing nearby but none of them came forward to help. We can assume that, <u>since they were part of a large group, each one of them assumed that the others were going to help Roger or maybe that the situation wasn't that serious</u>. Thus, this lack of help illustrates diffusion of responsibility.
There may be no ethical and spiritual absolute truths. without God
In trendy, absolute truth is something that is usually legitimate, no matter parameters or context. absolutely the in the time period connotes one or greater of: a great of reality that cannot be exceeded; whole truth; unvarying and everlasting truth.
Absolutely the is not a deity, however rather taken into consideration an impersonal, ultimate fact and electricity that lifestyles and all reality cannot exist out of doors. it's also believed to be the cause of the universe; it is the popular soul that gives lifestyles to all.
Absolute reality is something that is actually at all times and in all locations. it's miles something this is usually real no matter what the circumstances. it is a truth that cannot be changed. for example, there are no spherical squares.
In step with Takeshi Umehara, a few historic texts of Buddhism country that the "certainly Absolute and the genuinely loose should be nothingness", the "void".
Learn more about spiritual absolutes here: brainly.com/question/27445133
#SPJ1
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>