The ruling is that States must regulate commerce within their boundaries.
The case Wabash v. Illinois (1886) is about allegations of discrimination by the state's regulations because cost of transporting from New York to Giman Illinois is more cheaper than transporting from Peoria, Illinois to Gilman, Illinois.
- The case was access by the Supreme Court and then limited the right of states to regulate businesses that dealt with interstate commerce.
In conclusion, the case ruling state that the States must regulate commerce within their boundaries.
Learn more about Wabash v. Illinois here
<em>brainly.com/question/5136373</em>
Answer:
strategy of burning or destroying crops
Explanation:
Christianity : 31.11%
Islam : 24.9%
Hinduism : 15.16%
Buddhism : 6.62%
I guess the 3rd choice, sharecropping was typically used between slaves and their previous owners. the previous owners would offer shelter and food to the now freed slaves and their families. since they were uneducated and had no money it was the best option many freed slaves had at the time.