<u>Answer:</u>
This statement is not true. It is a false statement because both these sub parts are not small or are not for kids. Both these are adults and are of legal age so they are not applied to juveniles.
Sub part C and D are found guilty of the crime that they have committed and are put behind the bars. They are imprisoned and not applied to juveniles for the modification in their behavior and to change them.
Answer: the answer is sudan
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
The correct answer is speech impairment.
Speech impairment refers to a condition in which an individual is unable to communicate clearly and be coherently understood by others due to difficulties in their speech and articulation. Individuals with speech impairments might be unable to pronounce words correctly, produce speech sounds and speak with abnormal duration, pitch or vocal quality.
