Canes because they are just better
Answer:
D. cascade down
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this is an example of MBO working as objectives cascade down through the organization. This can be said since the organizational goals/objectives start at the top of the organization (executives and managers) and move down through the organizational hierarchy to the lower level employees. Thus cascading down.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The cost of an slice of pizza is $3.94
Explanation:
Hi, we have to construct 2 equations with the information of the problem, the first one is " 8 slices of pizza and 7 soft drinks for $45.10".

And the second one, when "The second group bought 6 slices of pizza and 5 soft drinks for $33.34" is.

Where: P = pizza slices and D= soft drinks
We need to substract one equation from the other, but firs we need to equal one of the variables. In order to do so, we multiply our first equation by 5 and the second one for 7, therefore we get.
First equation

And the second one:

And now, we substract them and solve.




The cost of a slide of pizza is $3.94
In case you needed to find the cost of the soft drink, we just substitute P for 3.94 in any of the initial equations, that is:



The cost of a soft drink is $1.94
Best of luck.
CVP analysis is more difficult because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.
<h3>What is a
CVP analysis?</h3>
This is an analysis that find out how changes in the firm's variable and fixed costs affect the firm's profit.
Hence, the analysis is difficult when using absorption costing than when using variable costing because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.
Read more about CVP analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/26654564</em>