Answer:
Option (B) 5.5%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question :
Factor Risk premium
Factor 1 5%
Factor 2 3%
Beta of stock A on factor 1 = 1.4
Beta of stock A on factor 2 = 0.5
Expected return = 14%
Now,
Expected return
= Risk free rate + (Beta of factor 1 × Risk premium of factor 1) + (Beta of factor 2 × Risk premium of factor 2)
or
14% = Risk free rate + (1.4 × 5%) + (0.5 × 3%)
or
14% = Risk free rate + ( 7% + 1.5% )
or
Risk free rate = 5.5%
Hence,
Option (B) 5.5%
Enough to buy a Mercedes Benz.
Risk tolerance gets lower and lower as you get closer to needing the money from your investment.
If you don't need the money for 50 years, you are more likely to take risks in the stock market or other higher risk investments in return for higher rewards. If you need the money tomorrow, you will not be willing to risk it all in the stock market because even though it <em>could </em>double, you might lose it all.
Answer:
$ 2 per unit on average
Explanation:
Calculation for what the financial advantage (disadvantage) of purchasing the parts from the outside supplier would be:
First step is to calculate the Relevant cost of making
Relevant cost of making = 9 + 7 + 1 + ( 5 * 80 % ) Relevant cost of making= $ 21
Now let calculate the Financial advantage of buying
Financial advantage of buying = ( 21 - 19 )
Financial advantage of buying= $ 2 per unit on average
Therefore the financial advantage (disadvantage) of purchasing the parts from the outside supplier would be:$ 2 per unit on average
Answer:
The unstated assumptions in the problems given is that the company may require more units of aluminium and steel, which would allow for producing more bicycles.A linear programming model cannot account for this.
Explanation:
Linear programming model: this is an algebraic description of te objectives to be minimized and the constraints to be satisfied by the variables.
