Answer:
The naturalistic methodological approach is sometimes rejected in the field of psychology on the basis that psychological events possess attributes that do not exist in purely natural events. One of the characteristics of the psychological is its intentionality. Starting from the distinction between the basic psychological processes and the behavioral products that emerge from them, it is proposed that the former constitute a proper field of natural science but that: nevertheless, they lead to the generation of theories capable of explaining intentional behavior.
Psychology is the study of individual behavior, that is, it is the investigation of processes that occur in the individual, such as perception or learning. In psychology, therefore, you should necessarily focus on possibly universal processes
natural science methods and goals are probably not useful for studying people and social behavior; Instead of explaining to people and society, research should aim at understanding human behavior ... In this vision, the most interesting questions are not about the "reality of the world, but about people's interpretations of it.
Intentional behavior, such as contingencies of reinforcement, educational experience or the current social context, we can see that a “causal” approach cannot easily be rejected. For example, we can see that a behavior now occurs because in the past it was followed by certain consequences. However, even recognizing the presence of such causes, the interpretationist researcher will insist that they influence the behavior only to the extent that they have any meaning for the individual and according to the intentions and motives that he harbors (and hence the same "causes" influence different individuals differently). Ultimately, then, the most important factors lie in these meanings, intentions and motives.
Answer: Under the Great Law, democratic principles were built into the decision making process: equality among all chiefs, in the Grand Council with the same level of authority. ... men were nominated as chiefs (male authority) by women (female authority) both men and women belonged to the mother's clan (giving women authority)
All of the tribe thought the sachem was very wise and did the best thing for the tribe. He also had a council to help him make decisions, called sagamores. The tribe would present the sachem with gifts. The sachem was also in charge of the land the tribe lived on and decided about selling any of the land. Explanation:
Answer:
they are:
biotechnology and pharmaceutics
banking and financial services
and furniture also.
In opposition to Marx, Weber argued that there are <u>three</u> dimensions of inequality.
Our world is filled with individuals with a variety of identities and compelling narratives to share. Unfortunately, sometimes others try to divide us by exploiting our differences. We'll look at the various aspects of inequality that sociologists consider in relation to the identifying characteristics of social class, age, ethnicity, gender, and disability.
The study of social class inequality was pioneered by Karl Marx and Max Weber. They believed that a person's chances for success in life are structurally influenced by their class position, and that economic and status inequalities (in the form of their link to the means of production) characterize modern society.
To know more about inequality
brainly.com/question/1465272
#SPJ4
I believe it was George Stephenson.
