Answer:
Classical conditioning
Explanation:
In psychology, classical conditioning is a method of learning by pairing stimuli. Usually, first one stimulus causes a natural answer (the unconditioned stimulus causes an unconditioned answer), then this unconditioned stimulus is paired with another stimulus that doesn't cause an answer by itself at first but after some repetitions, the new stimulus (conditioned stimulus) causes the same answer from the unconditioned stimulus and this answer becomes the conditioned answer.
In this example, pets have learned to pair the sound of the electric can opener with the arrival of their canned food so they have learned to respond to this sound and therefore, they run toward the sound of the can opener even if there is no cat food present. <u>The can opener would be the conditioned stimulus which has been paired with the food (unconditioned stimulus) and has created the response of the pets running toward this sound (Conditioned answer). </u>Therefore this is an example of classical conditioning.
Answer:
is it Indian language
Explanation:
sorry but if u translate it to English I can help u
The answer is<u> "structural plasticity".</u>
Brain plasticity, otherwise called neuroplasticity, is a term that alludes to the mind's capacity to change and adjust because of experience. At the point when individuals say that the mind has pliancy, they are not recommending that the cerebrum is like plastic. Neuro alludes to neurons, the nerve cells that are the building squares of the mind and sensory system, and pliancy alludes to the cerebrum's pliability.
There are two kinds of neuroplasticity, including:
Functional plasticity: The brain's capacity to move capacities from a harmed territory of the mind to other intact regions.
Structural plasticity: The brain's capacity to really change its physical structure because of learning.
Answer: Different writers
Explanation:
Mark 6:4 uses lack of honor to describe the same thing that Luke does when he writes that Jesus said no one is accepted in their home country.
They both used different writing styles and neither were first hand witnesses to Jesus' ministry so they relied on what they heard from others. It is therefore logical to assume that the reason the words are different is that these are different writers who described things differently.
Answer:
(e) HCF - 3
(g) HCF - 2
(h) HCF - 5
hope it helps you pls follow me on brainly for further help ☺️
