Answer: Young poultry is best for roasting, broiling, and frying. Older poultry requires braising or stewing methods. Either way, slow, even heat should be used for tender, juicy, evenly done poultry.
Answer:
supply
Explanation:
it is how much of something you have to sell
Answer:
The correct answer is: an increase; fall; substitutes; decrease; complements; increase.
Explanation:
Technological improvement has lowered the cost of producing cell phone batteries. This reduction in the cost of production will cause the price of cell phone batteries to decline. Since batteries are used as inputs in the cell phone. The reduction in the price of inputs means that the cost of production would decrease. The firms will be able to supply more at the same cost. The supply, as a result, will increase. The supply curve will shift to the right. The price of cell phones will decline.
Cell phones and landlines are substitutes. They can be used in place of each other. A decrease in the price of cell phones would cause the demand for landlines to decrease as the consumers will prefer a cheaper substitute.
The cell phones and applications, however, are use complements. They are used together. So when the price of cell phones decrease and its demand increase, the demand for cell phone applications will increase as well.
Answer:
Adjusted accounting profit - $63,200
Cash inflow / Outflow - $63,200
Depreciation Tax shield - $63,200
Explanation:
Revenue - $188,000
Variable cost ($57,000)
Contribution $131,000
Rental cost ($37,000)
Depreciation (17,000)
($54,000)
PBIT 77,000
Income Tax (40%) (30,800)
Net Income 46,200
A) Adjusted Accounting profit
Add back non cash expenses (depreciation) = 46,200+$17000 =$63,200
B)Cash Inflow/Outflow
Revenue $188,000
Variable cost (57,000)
Rental cost (37000)
Income Tax (30,800)
$63,200
C Depreciation Tax Shield
Tax shield =40%*17,000= $6800
Cash income from operation (EBITDA*(1-tax rate) = 56,400
Add back $6,800 = 6,800
$63,200
Answer:
"No" is the correct response. A further explanation is provided below.
Explanation:
- Along with comparison to the average individual or working people although the CEO seems to be the top-level title than the worker or contractor. Consequently, the compensation of such a CEO's job is not compared with the compensation of that same typical individual employee business throughout the firm.
- This behavior would be not only ethically reprehensible but economically accountable for such SEC regulation lobbying. SEC guidelines don’t mandate their CEO's proportion towards the average worker to be reported.
Thus, the above is the correct response.