"Accountability" in journalism: Journalism businesses typically apprehend this principle of duty through admitting mistakes and correcting them promptly, as referred to in SPJ's Code of Ethics. most additionally submit complaints in their news efforts contained in letters to the editor.
The definition of accountability is taking or being assigned duty for something that you have executed or something you're presupposed to do. An example of responsibility is when a worker admits mistakes she made on a challenge.
Accountability, in phrases of ethics and governance, is equated with answerability, blameworthiness, legal responsibility, and the expectancy of account-giving. As in a thing of governance, it's been central to discussions related to problems in the public quarter, nonprofit, and personal and personal contexts. duty is a guarantee that a man or woman or an agency could be evaluated on their performance or behavior associated with something for which they're responsible. The term is associated with obligation but is seen as greater from the attitude of oversight.
Learn more about Accountability here:
brainly.com/question/980342
#SPJ4
Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Answer:
Credit life Insurance
Explanation:
The scenario describes Credit life insurance
This is a form of insurance policy that that is designed to pay off the balance on a policy holder's outstanding loan in case of death. It is designed for the protection of lender and heirs who are co signers from loss in case of the death of the borrower.
The insurance is liable to the balance on the loan as at the time of the death of the borrower.
Answer:
d. purchase the machine because each partner has one vote in management matters
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the partners vote whether or not to buy a new machine for $100 so the violet and William would agree on this but Xavier does not agree
Now according to this situation the machine should be purchased as each partner vote is necessary also there is a majority of 2 person to buy the machine
hence, the option d is correct
