D is the correct answers as that is what interest groups do
We had lack of supplies going into the war. So, getting support from France and other countries would help our military in the fight against Great Britain.
Also, France had more experience fighting, and therefore, help train our soldiers.
Americans also did not have much of a navy. So, with over 10,000 French soldiers and 30,000 French sailors, the French help was very important to our military.
When we became allies with the French, it helped our trade.
When the French helped us, it opened doors for other countries to assist us
Answer:
The Philippine campaign showed Japan's aggressiveness and perseverance towards battles.
Explanation:
The Philippine campaign showed that the Japanese government, even at a disadvantage, would not so easily win the victory of its enemies of war. This is because the Japanese army has shown itself to be aggressive and persevering in its fight against American forces, even if defeat was almost guaranteed. This showed that Japanese soldiers saw the battlefield as something that represented their honor, for this reason, they would rather die fighting than surrender to the enemy army.
The four types of economic assumptions that can negatively affect the environment are:
1. N<span>atural resources and human resources are infinite
2. It g</span><span>rants an event in the future less value than one in the present; short-term costs and benefits are granted more importance than longterm costs and benefits.
3. A</span>ll costs and benefits associated with an exchange of goods or services are borne by individuals engaging directly in the transaction (<span>buyer and seller alone).
</span>4. E<span>conomic growth is required to keep employment high and maintain social order.</span>
The correct answer is English
English settlers brought the common law to the United States because it had existed in Britain long before the settlers started moving to the United States. The common law dealt with everyday occurrences of law breaking and was about precedent. If a judge made a decision on something in a certain way, then future judges would have to make the same decision for consistency purposes.
