<span>1876 Supreme Court case ruled against any individual right to bear armsSecond Amendment guaranteed only states' rights to maintain militiasState governments could regulate guns however they saw fit<span>Presser v. Illinois affirmed Cruikshank ruling, further clarified that Second Amendment rights had not been "incorporated"—that is, they were not binding on the states</span></span>
Until quite recently, the answer to that question was pretty simple—the Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment was established in just a few cases. The first of these was United States v. Cruikshank. You can read more about this case here, but the short version is that in 1876 the Court ruled that the Second Amendment served only to protect the states against the federal government. Because the states in 1787 were worried that a too-powerful federal government might trample their rights, the Court said, the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution guaranteeing their right to maintain militias. The Second Amendment did not, in this interpretation, provide any individual right to keep and bear arms; it only guaranteed a state's right to maintain a militia. Moreover, since these militias were to be "well regulated," and since the Second Amendment was aimed only at the threat posed by the federal government, state governments were—according to this ruling—free to regulate guns in any manner they saw fit.
France
The newly formed League of Nations, following World War I, set up "mandates" for governmental oversight of territories which were formerly under the control of the German Empire or the Ottoman Empire (the losing side in World War I). These mandates were in territories in Africa, the Middle East and Asia that were deemed not yet ready to govern themselves. (There was some bias in that sort of judgment, of course.)
In the Middle East, France was given the Mandate for Syria and Lebanon. Britain was given the Mandate for Palestine as well as supervisory government over the Kingdom of Iraq.
Answer:
can u be a little more specific and ill see if i can help
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
The separation of power is specified in the first three articles of the Constitution: one article per one branch of the government. The supremacy is established in Article VI of the constitution.
The Mita system was a mandatory public service in the society of the Inca Empire. Historians use the haspancized term mita to differentiate the system as it was modified by the spanish colonial government.