Answer:
The Civil Rights Movement began to change after 1965. Some African Americans began to reject the calls for non-violent protests. These people wanted changes to occur much more quickly. They demanded action now, rather than the slower changes that usually came from peaceful demonstrations.
Explanation:
Explanation:
It’s hard to imagine a political institution less suited to a 21st-century liberal democracy than the Electoral College. It arose from a convoluted compromise hammered out late in the Constitutional Convention, and the rise of political parties in the late 18th century and the spread of democratic ideals in the early 19th quickly undermined its rationales. If it didn’t exist, no one today would consider creating it.
But the Electoral College is worse than merely useless. Its primary function is to malapportion political power, and it does so — indeed, has always done so — with strikingly awful consequences. A state is entitled to a number of electors equal to its number of senators and representatives. Before the Civil War, the combination of the Electoral College and the Three-Fifths Clause, counting a slave as three-fifths of a person, gave the Slave Power outsize control in electing the president, with the consequence that antebellum presidents were almost always either slaveholders or at least friendly to their interests (the major exceptions were both named Adams). After the war, every person counted as a full person for apportionment purposes — but with the collapse of Reconstruction and the violent disfranchisement of African-Americans throughout the South, that increase in representation once again redounded only to the benefit of white male power-holders, a situation that was not largely rectified until the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Because a state’s number of electors is based on total population, not actual voters, it gives the states no incentive to enfranchise new groups of people, or to make voting easier for those eligible. And because states want to maximize their influence in selecting the president, they also have a strong incentive to use a winner-take-all approach to awarding electors, which all but two states currently do. The result — as we’ve now seen twice in the last two decades — is that a popular vote loser can be an Electoral College winner.
In a liberal democracy, not everything need be decided by majority vote. But once something is put to a vote, it is hard to understand why the side getting fewer votes should win. And Americans have long understood themselves to be voting for their president, not for presidential electors. It is long past time to get rid of the Electoral College.
by jese wingman
Answer:
Correct answer is D. The European Plain
.
Explanation:
D is the correct answer as it covers a vast territory that stretches from United Kingdom to Russia and it includes lowlands in that area.
A and B are not correct as this are mountainous area, where we don't have that much developed agriculture, while C is not correct of course, as in the English Channel it is impossible to develop farms.
When he meets bill, an Africans Americana, Paul assumes that bill will view him as an arrogant and spoiled white man. Paul's belief is an example of meta-stereotype.
<h3>Is there a part of the brain that supports and aids such instinctive responses as fear and aggression?</h3>
In humans, the amygdala can be activated to promote aggressive outbursts.
<h3>What link has been discovered between self-image experiments?</h3>
Prejudice is more prevalent in Europe among those whose positive self-image is in jeopardy.
<h3>What aspect of bias is affective?</h3>
The bad feelings that prejudiced individuals experience when around groups they disapprove of make up its emotional component. The emotive aspect of bias is usually the one that gets the most attention.
To Know more about meta-stereotype.
brainly.com/question/13855242
#SPJ4