Answer:
<h2>The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership) is often classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions. A general recognition of a right to private property is found more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for production rather than consumption.[1]</h2><h2 /><h2>A right to property is recognised in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[2] but it is not recognised in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[3] The European Convention on Human Rights, in Protocol 1, article 1, acknowledges a right for natural and legal persons to "peaceful enjoyment of his possessions", subject to the "general interest or to secure the payment of taxes."</h2><h2 /><h2>Definition </h2><h2>Relationship to other rights </h2><h2>History </h2><h2>See also </h2><h2>Notes </h2><h2>References </h2>
<h2>External links</h2>
Answer: No, because he lacks standing
Explanation:
As a private citizen who is not a lawyer, Jim cannot represent his fellow employees as that would require being a lawyer. Were he representing himself alone, he would have been allowed to represent himself.
As a non-lawyer however, he cannot represent multiple people as plaintiff. He therefore has no legal standing to do so.
Answer:
she should become more knowledgeable by talking with a financial adviser pr by taking a class she should try to spend less money and put whatever she can in a safe place
Explanation:
