Answer:
I didn't like his react (Deny)
Explanation:
He disavowed Masonry and religious thoughts that opposed Catholic belief. Which isn't really that good once you truly think about. People should have there own beliefs no one should be disavowed for it.
“right to fair application of the law” meaning they will be tried fairly and have equal protection under the law and the government must adhere to and respect the legal rights of an individual
Answer:
Are we supposed to translate?
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe the correct answer is Y.
Y. The Congress shall have Power To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The act of inflciting bodily harm to the woman is a crime under "actus reus".
But there is no intentional crime committed under "mens rea".
So, the act doesn't qualify as a crime.
Explanation:
In criminal law,<u> "actus reus" is when a person physically harms another person</u> along with <u>"mens rea" which is the mental intention of doing the crime and planning it</u>. That means that an act can be considered a crime only when the actus reus and mens rea are hand-in-hand.
In the given scenario, Joseph's act of slamming his hand on the table is the result of his anger on being served a non-vegetarian dish even though he is a vegan. And this resulted in the bodily harm of the woman nearby. And this act of inflicting bodily harm to another person is not an intentional act, for Joseph did not pre-plan it. So, we can safely say that <u>the action does not constitute a criminal act.
</u>