Answer:
The answer is D. audience gave a well-deserved.
Explanation:
Audiences normally <em>give </em>and not <em>receive </em>applauses, so this is the error in the sentence, which allows us to eliminate the other which don't have a "gave" for verb, which basically are options: A, C and E.
Why isn't B? Well, because our rule about hyphens in adjectives, tells us that if the adjective goes before the noun, it should be hyphenated. But, if the adjective goes after, then it should not. In this case, our noun is "applause" and as you can see it goes after the "well-deserved" adjective, so this is the reason why it's hyphenated. Other story would be if it said: <em>the round of applause was well deserved (</em>no hyphen, as it goes after).
Answer:
How a reader will see everything in a story.
Explanation:
I took the quiz on edgenuity.
Hope this Helps!
The answer to your question is C. An ode is a lyric poem written in the form to address a particular subject ( a poem meant to sung)
Answer:
In many houses the Prussian officer ate at the same table with the family.
... in the house both chatted freely, and each evening the German remained a little longer warming himself at the hospitable hearth<em>. </em>
<em />
Explanation:
The excerpt you were given is the following:
At the end of a short time, once the first terror had subsided, calm was again restored. In many houses the Prussian officer ate at the same table with the family. He was often well-bred, and, out of politeness, expressed sympathy with France and repugnance at being compelled to take part in the war. This sentiment was received with gratitude; besides, his protection might be needful some day or other. By the exercise of tact the number of men quartered in one's house might be reduced; and why should one provoke the hostility of a person on whom one's whole welfare depended? Such conduct would savor less of bravery than of fool- hardiness. And foolhardiness is no longer a failing of the citizens of Rouen as it was in the days when their city earned renown by its heroic defenses. Last of all-final argument based on the national politeness—the folk of Rouen said to one another that it was only right to be civil in one's own house, provided there was no public exhibition of familiarity with the foreigner. Out of doors, therefore, citizen and soldier did not know each other; but in the house both chatted freely, and each evening the German remained a little longer warming himself at the hospitable hearth.
The lines that show how friendly relations between French and German people remained despite the war are the following:
<em>I</em><em>n many houses the Prussian officer ate at the same table with the family.</em>
<em>... in the house both chatted freely, and each evening the German remained a little longer warming himself at the hospitable hearth. </em>
<em />
During the war, in which Germany invaded France, the French had to take in German officers and decided to offer them their hospitality. They fed them well and treated them as guests, building a peaceful relationship despite the war.