Answer:
Output.
Explanation:
because it is an effect of production but not a factor.
There are numerous reasons, things like war, immigration, increased poverty, or things like unpredictable natural disasters. When a hurricane strikes and destroys entire cities and housing it has to be fixed quickly and that is spending that was not planned since you can't expect things like that. Wars often cost much more than what was planned because bad things happen and they need to be fixed. Immigration can lead to an increase in social welfare spending since not all immigrants find a job quickly and establish themselves in the society.
Answer:
1. c) b>d
d) c>g
2. No dominant strategy equilibrium is also a Nash equilibrium.
Explanation:
Payoff matrix are used in business as it represent the possible outcomes of the decisions made. In the given scenario player 1 and player 2 have different outcomes based on the game matrix. The player 1 will get best possible payoff when he falls in Top Left matrix. This is dominant strategy which must be Nash equilibrium.
There were 72 (108 - 36) more maple trees in the woodlot before the bug problem. There were 108 maple trees in the woodlot before the bug problem. There are 36 maple trees in the woodlot after the bug problem.
The following information is given in the question:
Ratio of maple trees to oak trees before bug problem = 9:5
Ratio of maple trees to oak trees after replanting = 3:11
Total number of oak trees after replanting =132
Total number of trees in the woodlot is the same before and after the bug problem.
Let the number of maple trees after replanting be 'x'
From the data above, we can find the number of maple trees after replanting as follows:


So, number of maple trees after replanting in the woodlot are 36.


Let number of maple trees before bug problem be 'z'.
We can find the number of maple trees before bug problem as follows:


