Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
We need to find the segment margin of the deparment, which is equal to annual contribution margin minus avoidable fixed costs:
Wallen Corporation
Annual contribution margin $80,000
Annual fixed costs $160,000
Unavoidable fixed costs $90,000
Avoidable fixed costs $70,000
Segment Margin = Annual contribution margin - avoidable fixed costs
= $80,000 - $70,000
= $10,000
Therefore, if the company eliminated this department, it would have a financial advantage of $10,000, equivalent to the deparment's current segment margin.
Answer:
O Downsizing
Explanation:
A lay off happens when the employer has closed down, has changed locations, or when there is not sufficient work for all the employees. A layoff is not caused by an employee's fault.
Downsizing refers to scaling down of operation. When a company downsizes, some of the employees will be laid off. Theodosia should mention she was laid off in her next application. The potential employer will realize that she wasn't at fault at her previous workplace.
Answer:
the decrease in the value of the retained earning is $172,500
Explanation:
The computation of the decrease in the value of the retained earning is given below:
The dividend of the stock is
= (25,000 shares - 2,000 shares) × 10% × $75
= $172,500
Since there is the stock dividend of $172,500 so it ultimately reduced the retained earning account by $172,500
Answer:
Fee Receivable$7,200
To Service Fees Earned $7,200
(Being the service fess earned is recorded)
Explanation:
Th adjusting entry is shown below:
Fee Receivable$7,200
To Service Fees Earned $7,200
(Being the service fess earned is recorded)
For recording this we debited the fees receivable as it increased the assets and credited the services fees earned as it increase the revenues
Since the payment is made for 6 months but we have to recorded for 4 months i.e computed from September 1 to December 31
= $10,800 × 4 months ÷ 6 months
= $7,200
Answer:
True
Explanation:
"Nonliquidating corporate distributions are distributions of cash and/or property by a continuing corporation to its shareholders. At the shareholder level, a nonliquidating corporate distribution can produce a variety of tax consequences, including taxable dividend treatment, capital gain or loss, or a reduction in stock basis. [...]
The corporate-level tax consequences of a nonliquidating corporate distribution depend on whether the distribution consists of cash or property (other than cash). The corporation does not recognize gain or loss when it distributes cash to shareholders or when it redeems stock in exchange for cash payments."
Reference: Ellentuck, Albert B. “Understanding the Effects of Nonliquidating Distributions on Corporations.” The Tax Adviser, 1 Jan. 2009
