An author claims that "Athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to prison." The author provides the
following reason as support: A cool article in Kid's Sports Magazine says athletes are role models. I agree! It's heartbreaking for kids to learn that our heroes are cheaters. If players do steroids, send them to prison! They deserve to be punished for making us look stupid for cheering for them.
Which choice best describes the reason the author provides?
It is effective. It supports the claim clearly and logically.
It is emotional. It expresses personal feelings that cannot be backed with research.
It is irrelevant. It discusses a fact that is off topic and does not support the claim.
It is unverified. It does not cite a source to show where the information was located.
It would look definitely different as far as the geographic's and everything would look the same as far as size and it would be one big huge piece of land with small states and borders would be way different also.
