Answer:
1. Please find it attached.
If both of them don't get lawyers they will each make half of the $5 million being $2.5 million a piece.
If one side hires a lawyer and the other doesn't, the side with the lawyer will win 0.9 of $5 million which is $4,500,000. However they would have paid the lawyer $200,000 so that payout drops to $4,500,000. The other would make 0.1 which is $500,000.
If they both get a lawyer they will each get half which is $2,500,000 but they would both have paid their lawyers $200,000 a piece so the net payout would be $2,300,000.
2. The Nash Equilibrium is the alternative that it would not serve either party to deviate from as it serves them both well. The Nash Equilibriums would be If both don't get a lawyer or if both get a lawyer.
3. Yes they would because without lawyers they would make more money as they would not have to pay the $200,000 in fees.
40%
An easy baby and a tough baby vary primarily in that the former has more periodic bodily processes and more positive responses to stimuli, whilst the latter has fewer normal body processes and more negative responses.
Every parent wishes their children were simple. Parents with challenging infants may harbour envy for those of peaceful infants. However, studies suggest that having kids with a challenging temperament is not always a bad thing. This article will define temperament, examine the three varieties of temperament, and instruct you on how to handle a challenging infant.
Each kid is unique from birth despite since they are reared in the same home, as parents of several children are already aware. New-borns display various ways of responding to their surroundings right away.
To know more about easy baby refer to brainly.com/question/15607034
#SPJ4
Answer:
13. Charlie would be excluded for cause;
14. the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of “clear and convincing,” Casey can still be acquitted.
Explanation:
Since it was realised that Charlie has a relationship with on of the parties summoned for a case, this will lead to Charlie been removed and excluded for cause. This is because it is believed that due to the fact that he has a relationship with the person, there may be bias which may lead to a false outcome regarding the case.
For the second question, Cash can be acquitted if there's proof which is provided by the plaintiff and the proof is clear enough and convincing.
Answer:
Outstanding checks
Explanation:
One of the reasons why a cash book and a bank statement might <em>not show identical entries arise</em> from outstanding checks.
Outstanding checks are payments that have not yet been cleared and debited to the account at the bank.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ann does not recognize gain.
Bob gains 15,000 for his service
2. Ann has a basis of 150,000 and Bob has a basis of 45,000(30,000+15,000)
3. Robin Corportaion has a basis of 150,000 in the property Ann transferred and a basis of 30,000 in the property Bob transferred.
