1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mojhsa [17]
3 years ago
15

You are considering two equally risky annuities, each of which pays $5,000 per year for 10 years. Investment ORD is an ordinary

(or deferred) annuity, while Investment DUE is an annuity due. Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Group of answer choices The present value of ORD exceeds the present value of DUE, and the future value of ORD also exceeds the future value of DUE. If the going rate of interest decreases from 10% to 0%, the difference between the present value of ORD and the present value of DUE would remain constant. A rational investor would be willing to pay more for DUE than for ORD, so their market prices should differ. The present value of DUE exceeds the present value of ORD, while the future value of DUE is less than the future value of ORD. The present value of ORD exceeds the present value of DUE, while the future value of DUE exceeds the future value of ORD.
Business
1 answer:
liubo4ka [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A rational investor would be willing to pay more for DUE than for ORD, so their market prices should differ.

Explanation:

If both annuities pay the same amount ($5,000 per year), then the present value of the annuity due will always be higher than the present value of the ordinary annuity. Therefore, an investor will always be willing to pay more (at equal risk) for the annuity due than the ordinary annuity.

E.g. let say that both annuities carry a 10% interest rate.

The present value of the annuity due is:

PV = $5,000 + [$5,000 x 5.7590 (PV annuity factor, 10%, 9 periods)] = $33,795

The present value of the ordinary annuity is:

PV = $5,000 x 6.1446 (PV annuity factor, 10%, 10 periods) = $30,723

The logic behind this is that $1 today is worth more than $1 tomorrow, and the annuity due's first payment is today, while the ordinary annuity's first payment is in 1 year.

You might be interested in
Brandon, a manager at Cerium Corp., is required to provide individual performance feedback to his subordinates. In this scenario
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Based on the fact that Brandon has to provide information to subordinates, this communication is at an organizational level.

<h3>What is organizational level communication?</h3>

This refers to communication that takes place between employees of a company as a result of organizational requirements.

Brandon as a manager, has to communicate with other employees who are subordinates so this is organizational level communication.

Find out more on levels of communication at brainly.com/question/26933782.

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
What is the purpose of a consumer cooperative?
olga55 [171]

I think the answer would B. to improve the image of its members

SORRY if it is wrong

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I"'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!
Lilit [14]

Answer:number one

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Paul and Michael sell magazine subscriptions by telephone. Paul is paid $1.00 for every five calls he makes, while Michael is pa
lesya [120]

Answer:

Fixed-ratio; variable-ratio

Explanation:

Paul’s telephoning is reinforced on a fixed-ratio schedule, whereas Michael’s is reinforced on a variable-ratio schedule.

A fixed ratio reinforcement schedule: They are a set number of responses that must occur before the behavior is rewarded. This means the number of responses to be exhibited by an individual in order to be rewarded is fixed.

Fixed-ratios are better used to optimize the quantity of output.

Variable ratio reinforcement schedule: The number of responses needed for a reward varies. This implies that the number of responses to be rewarded varies according to requirement. It is a partial reinforcement.

4 0
3 years ago
Omega, Inc., a U.S.-based firm entered into an agreement with another party to exchange currency and execute the deal at a speci
Lana71 [14]

Answer:

The answer is hedging.

Explanation:

Omega is engaging in hedging. Omega is locking the future spot price of the currency now. If this transaction happens over the counter, we call it forward contract. And if it happens at the exchange, we call it futures.

Hedging the foreign exchange risk is to reduce the risk of adverse depreciation of the currency in which Omega is expecting to receive.

Hedging is very important in risk management.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A company has a long‐lived asset with a carrying value of $120,000, expected future cash flows of $130,000, present value of exp
    8·1 answer
  • People do all kinds of work from home, including research, management, marketing, and creative work.
    7·1 answer
  • List and explain five different asset classes. What are some reasons individuals would invest in these types of asset classes?
    7·1 answer
  • The competitive market system:
    8·1 answer
  • Jackson just received a settlement in a lawsuit that promises two future payments of $450, the first payment at the end of the 7
    8·1 answer
  • On December 31, it was estimated that goodwill of $6,000,000 was impaired. In addition, a patent with an estimated useful econom
    11·1 answer
  • If I was gonna be a business person what would I be and why?
    5·1 answer
  • Ray and Chuck own 50 percent capital and profits interests in Alpine Properties LLC. Alpine builds and manages rental real estat
    8·1 answer
  • how do you manage pasture land for Sheep, goats and chyangras ????explain!! any one know this answer then help meeee​
    11·1 answer
  • A chemical bond resulting from the sharing of electrons between two elements with very similar electronegativity are indicative
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!