1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anestetic [448]
3 years ago
5

Bell Computers purchases integrated chips at ​$350 per chip. The holding cost is ​$35 per unit per​ year, the ordering cos

t is ​$119 per​ order, and sales are steady at 405 per month. The​ company's supplier, Rich Blue Chip​ Manufacturing, Inc., decides to offer price concessions in order to attract larger orders. The price structure is shown below. Rich Blue​ Chip's Price Structure Quantity Purchased ​ Price/Unit ​ 1-99 units ​$350 ​ 100-199 units ​$325 200 or more units ​$300 ​a) What is the most​ cost-effective order quantity and the minimum annual cost for Bell Computers to​ order, purchase, and hold these integrated​ chips, using the data and discount choices​ provided, and using a fixed holding​ cost? The most​ cost-effective order quantity​ (assuming they take the most​ cost-effective discount, and use a fixed holding​ cost) is nothing units ​(enter your response as a whole ​number). At the chosen level of quantity​ discount, and using the fixed holding​ cost, what is the total annual cost for Bell computers to​ order, purchase, and hold the integrated chips​ : ​$ nothing ​(round your response to the nearest whole​ number). ​b) Bell Computers wishes to recalculate using a 10​% holding cost rather than the fixed ​$35 holding cost in part a. What is the most​ cost-effective order​ quantity, and what is the corresponding annual​ cost? The most​ cost-effective order quantity​ (assuming they take the most​ cost-effective discount, and use a​ percentage-of-price holding​ cost) is nothing units ​(enter your response as a whole ​number). At the chosen level of quantity​ discount, and using the ​percentage-of-price holding​ cost, what is the total annual cost for Bell computers to​ order, purchase, and hold the integrated chips​ : ​$ nothing ​(round your response to the nearest whole​ number).
Business
1 answer:
valentina_108 [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<h3><u>When holding costs are $35 per unit</u>,</h3>

1.The most cost-effective order quantity (assuming they take the most cost-effective discount, and use a fixed holding cost) is <u>182 units</u>.

2. At the chosen level of quantity, discount, and using the fixed holding cost, the total annual cost for Bell computers to order, purchase, and hold the integrated chips is <u>$1,585,898</u>.

<h3><u>When holding costs are 10% of purchase price per unit,</u></h3>

1.The most cost-effective order quantity (assuming they take the most cost-effective discount, and use a fixed holding cost) is <u>189 units</u>.

2. At the chosen level of quantity, discount, and using the fixed holding cost, the total annual cost for Bell computers to order, purchase, and hold the integrated chips is <u>$1,585,546.</u>

<h3>When holding costs are $35 per unit,</h3>

We follow these steps to arrive at the answer:

1. We have

Ordering Costs per order   $119

Holding Cost per unit            $35

Demand per month            405 units

Demand per year is                                405*12 = 4860 units

Since the most cost-effective order quantity is the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), we compute the EOQ

\mathbf{EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2SD}{H}}}

where

D is  demand per year

S is the Ordering cost per order

H is the holding cost per unit

Substituting the values we get,

EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2*(405*12)*119}{35}}

EOQ = \sqrt{33048}

\mathbf{EOQ = 181.7910889 \approx 182 units}

2. The annual costs of ordering, purchasing and holding the integrated chips is the sum of the cost of ordering, purchasing and holding the integrated  chips.

Since the EOQ at 182 units falls in the second slab of Rich Blue Manufacturing, Bell computer can purchase chips at $325 per unit

Cost of purchasing the chips     \mathbf{405*12*325 = 1579500}

Number of orders to placed         \frac{Annual Demand}{EOQ}

Number of orders to placed         \frac{405*12}{182}

Number of orders to placed   \mathbf{26.703 \approx 27 orders}

Cost of orders                           Number of orders * Cost per order

Cost of orders                               \mathbf{27 * 119 = 3213&#10;}

Holding Costs                        \frac{EOQ}{2} * Holding cost per unit

Holding Costs                               \frac{182}{2} * 35

Holding Costs                               \mathbf{3185&#10;}

Total annual costs       \mathbf{1579500 + 3213 + 3185 = 1585898}

<h3>When holding costs are 10% of purchase price per unit,</h3>

1. We need to calculate the EOQ, which holding cost at each purchase price

EOQ_{350} = (2*(405*12)*119)/(350*0.10) \approx 182 units

\mathbf{EOQ_{325} = (2*(405*12)*119)/(325*0.10)\approx 189 units}

EOQ_{300} = (2*(405*12)*119)/(300*0.10)\approx 197 units

Since the EOQ lies between 100 and 199 units in all the three costs, Bell Computers can purchase the units only at $325 per unit, so its holding cost will be 10% of $325, which is $32.50 per unit.

2.2. The annual costs of ordering, purchasing and holding the integrated chips is the sum of the cost of ordering, purchasing and holding the integrated  chips.

Since the EOQ at 189 units falls in the second slab of Rich Blue Manufacturing, Bell computer can purchase chips at $325 per unit

Cost of purchasing the chips     \mathbf{405*12*325 = 1579500}

Number of orders to placed         \frac{Annual Demand}{EOQ}

Number of orders to placed         \frac{405*12}{189}

Number of orders to placed   \mathbf{24.762 \approx 25 orders}

Cost of orders                           Number of orders * Cost per order

Cost of orders                               \mathbf{25 * 119 = 2975  }

Holding Costs                        \frac{EOQ}{2} * Holding cost per unit

Holding Costs                               \frac{189}{2} * 32.5

Holding Costs                               \mathbf{3071.25&#10;}

Total annual costs    \mathbf{1579500 + 2975 + 3071.25 = 1585546.25&#10;}

<h3></h3>
You might be interested in
A seller listed a property for $96,000. The property sold for $94,000. How would the purchase price appear on a full settlement
olganol [36]

Answer:

Debiting the buyer and crediting the seller by $94,000

Explanation:

Since the seller listed a property for $96,000 and it sold for $94,000, so the purchase price would be selling price of the property as the property would be sold and the other person pays the money to buy the property.  

So, the purchase price would appear through

Debiting the buyer and crediting the seller by $94,000

or

Buyer A/c Dr      $94,000

    To Seller A/c              $94,000

(Being purchase of property is recorded)

8 0
3 years ago
National Park Tours Co. is a travel agency.
Xelga [282]

Answer: The answer is provided below

Explanation:

a. The unadjusted trial balance has been attached.

b. The net income is calculated as sales minus the expenses. Regarding the question, after the trial balance has been prepared, the net income is the value of the company's operating expenses which is then subtracted from the fees that the company earned. Therefore, the net income will be:= 12300-6940 = 5360

3 0
4 years ago
Suppose that we observe two comparable properties that have each sold twice within the past four years. Property A sold 24 month
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

0.475% per month

Explanation:

value of property A 24 months ago = $500,000

current value of property A = $425,000

total decrease in value = $500,000 - $425,000 = $75,000 or 15%

monthly % decrease:

1.15 = (1 + r)²⁴

²⁴√1.15 = (1 + r)

1.0058 = 1 + r

r = 0.00584 = 0.58% decrease per month

value of property B 48 months ago = $575,000

current value of property A = $465,000

total decrease in value = $575,000 - $465,000 = $110,000 or 19.13%

monthly % decrease:

1.1913= (1 + r)⁴⁸

⁴⁸√1.1913 = (1 + r)

1.0037 = 1 + r

r = 0.0037 = 0.37% decrease per month

if both properties are weighted equally, then the market decrease per month = (0.58% x 1/2) + (0.37% x 1/2) = 0.475% per month

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following positions refers to a functional manager
lbvjy [14]
The where’s the picture !!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andrew carnegie was a native of what country? ireland scotland switzerland united states 2. carnegie made his fortune primarily
slavikrds [6]
He was born in the city of Dunfermline which is in the country Scotland. 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Endless Summer Polymers in Redondo Beach, CA makes foam board blanks for surf boards. They are able to count the number of units
    15·1 answer
  • In the Month of March, Digby received orders of 104 units at a price of $15.00 for their product Dell. Digby uses the accrual me
    13·1 answer
  • Ocean sound college, a liberal arts college located on the west coast, provides dormitory housing for approximately half of its
    10·1 answer
  • Which office has been criticized for placing business interests ahead of environmental concerns?
    6·1 answer
  • The following information is available for a company's utility cost for operating its machines over the last four months. Month
    6·1 answer
  • Give three examples of behavior that you believe is unethical that you have observed in school
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following are assumptions of perfect competition? Group of answer choices The products are identical. consumers hav
    10·1 answer
  • Childress Company produces three products, K1, S5, and G9. Each product uses the same type of direct material. K1 uses 4 pounds
    8·1 answer
  • Media companies earn money by selling which of the following?
    6·1 answer
  • Average and poor business writers are more likely than excellent writers to focus on the?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!