Answer:
$38,400
Explanation:
<em>1. Cash Purchases:</em>
The total purchases in the month of March is of $35,000.
It is given that 70% of Purchases are for cash.
Hence, 70% of $35,000 would be;
$39,000 x 0.70
$27,300
<em>2. Credit Purchases:
</em>
Remaining Balance of Purchases from the month of February:
For the month of February Cash Purchases can be calculated as follows;
$37,000 x 0.70
$25,900
Remaining Balance to be paid in March for the month of February can be calculated as follows;
$37,000 - $25,900
$11,100
<em>3. CASH PAYMENT for PURCHASES in MARCH:</em>
Cash Purchases = $27,300
Credit Purchases = $11,100
Hence;
<em>Cash Payment for purchases in March = Cash Purchases + Credit Purchases
</em>
Cash Payment for purchases in March = $27,300 + $11,100
Cash Payment for purchases in March = $38,400
Answer:
(9,594)
Explanation:
The net cash movement during a period the sum of cashflow from operations (CFO), cashflow from investing activities (CFI) and cashflow from financing (CFF) activities. On the other hand, that net cash movement is also calculated as the difference between end of year cash position and start of year cash position. Given that, we have the equation as below:
End of year cash position - Start of year cash position = CFO + CFI + CFF
Putting all the number together, we have:
7,102 - 6,836 = 15,435 - 5,575 + CFF
Solve the equation, we have CFF = (9,594)
Answer:
- Corporation
Explanation:
At least two people are required to form a corporation. The owners of a corporation are treated as separate entities from the business. The owners, also known as shareholders, enjoy limited liabilities to the debts of the corporation. In case of a liquidation, they cannot lose more than their capital contribution.
A sole proprietorship is owned by one person, but a partnership requires at least two people to form. The owners of sole proprietorships and partnerships have unlimited liabilities to the debts of their businesses. Should the businesses fail in meeting their obligations, owners' personal assets can be used to settle the outstanding debts.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, positive reinforcement means motivating someone to perform a job more efficiently and frequently by offering them some reward for doing so. While punishment refers to penalizing someone for any offense.
In the given case, James has been offering the incentives to his employees but have also made a clause to withhold them in case of unprofessional behavior.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B .
