As the empires expanded they got ideas from the places they had conquered. The conquered peoples cultures were also influenced by the empires.
In a free-market system, decisions are made by thousands of people who have information about resources, production technology and consumer desires.
A free-market system refers to an economic system in which there is no role of government, and the production and distribution of resources are determined by the market forces of demand and supply.
The market forces decide all the aspects of the economy, from what and how to produce, to the prices of products. When particular goods are in high demand, the production of those goods will increase, and if supply does not keep up with demand, the prices of the goods are bound to rise.
It is a spontaneous and decentralized market, in which individuals - as opposed to public agencies- make economic decisions. This is possible when the masses have information about resources, production technology and consumer desires.
To learn more about the free-market system: brainly.com/question/1188645
#SPJ4
Answer:
Jobs that involve creating something out of raw materials, like constructing new homes, are part of the <em><u>secondary</u></em> sector of the economy
Explanation:
The secondary sector turns primary goods into commodities and allocates them to the trade and services sector. The Secondary Sector of the economy is responsible for the transformation of goods and raw materials from the primary sector into goods, which are transferred for sale in the tertiary sector. When the secondary sector starts to grow and become more dynamic in a given location, we say that the industrialization process is taking place, that is, mechanized or manufactured production of goods.
Answer:
Numerous factors, which I don’t have time to do more than just list:
The USA never (officially) had a severely repressed peasant class and a group of nobles keeping them down.
The USA has a longstanding culture of individualism that doesn’t support people getting together for organized political action as well as other countries do.
The government suppressed Communist and proto-Communist organizations pretty harshly.
The government also took the wind out of their sails by actually making some reforms and doing some of the things they wanted: votes for women, labor laws, workplace safety laws, unemployment insurance, Social Security, Medicare, and so on. These weren’t all done out of the goodness the government’s heart, and business screamed its head off as it always does; but they had the effect of reducing interest in Communism.
The US has a huge culture of entrepreneurship. Many European countries do not. In Europe, corporations are things founded by plutocrats, not by ordinary people, but in America, most people can envision themselves running a small business even if they never intend to. This, too, discourages interest in Communism. As John Steinbeck put it, “I guess the trouble was that we didn't have any self-admitted proletarians. Everyone was a temporarily embarrassed capitalist. Maybe the Communists so closely questioned by the investigation committees were a danger to America, but the ones I knew—at least they claimed to be Communists—couldn't have disrupted a Sunday-school picnic. Besides they were too busy fighting among themselves.”
