Answer:
IDKK EITHER OF WHAT YOU ARE ASKING IDK
Explanation:
I just got myself confused XD
In simple interest, the interest rate is
i=(10500-9000)/9000=16.67%
In compound interest, compounded monthly,
10500=9000(1+i/12)^12
=>
APR=12(10500/9000)^(1/12)-1
=11.155%
(effective interest is still 16.67%)
Answer:
We expect investment spending to increase by $ 1 billion
Explanation:
If investment decreases by $ 1 billion if a 1 % change is made then that is sensitivity of investment to change in interest rate. Thus if there is a 1 % reduction in interest rate we expect to see a $ 1 billion increase in spending if this holds true.
Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.