Answer:
Metre. ... The metre is defined as the length of the path travelled by monochromatic light in a vacuum in 1299 792 458 of a second.
Explanation:
War promised a lot of African Americans freedom if they completed their task to fight for the country & depending on what war your specifically talking about it also helped them escape things like slavery (this is if you’re talking civil war or something back in the Slave days)Women on the other hand were expected to “pick up slack” and play the mans role and their role as women by doing things like working which was not common for women typically but became common once the men were off at war.
<span>#1) Why has Machiavelli’s The Prince evoked so much discussion and controversy?
Answer: The reason why his book evoked so much discussion and controversy was because he stressed that a ruler's right course of action was to use whatever means necessary to achieve the goals. Even if they required extreme measures. He believed in “The end justifies the means”
#2) What do readers find enlightening, terrifying, or disturbing?
Answer: What readers find enlightening, horrifying, and disturbing is the philosophy by which Machiavelli truly believes a great rulers should do. This is very apparent just from what he sees as the 3 primary values in for a ruler which are Fame, Power, and Glory.
<span>I hope it helps, Regards. </span></span>
Answer:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Act) opened public facilities, public accommodations, education, jobs, and voting booths to more Americans by making it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, and national origin. Women, however, were glaringly absent. In fact, only the employment provisions of Title VII mention women at all—and that mention was inserted as a last-minute attempt to defeat the bill entirely rather than to include women in the civil rights revolution. Believing that even those in Congress who supported racial equality would balk at the idea of gender equality, Virginia Congressman Howard Smith submitted an amendment to add “sex” to the categories protected by Title VII. Fortunately, his ploy backfired when the few women in Congress supported the amendment and ensured its survival.
Despite this small victory, the Act still ignored women in education. Women were not included in Title VI, which made it illegal to discriminate in federally financed educational programs. Meanwhile, Title VII excluded educational institutions, local and state governments, and the federal government, meaning that these organizations could continue to discriminate against women at all levels. At the time, many secondary schools required girls to take home economics and English, while boys took industrial arts and calculus. Physical education classes were sex segregated, with boys playing team sports while girls engaged in calisthenics or tumbling. Athletics remained a male-only bastion, with girls relegated to cheering. Even the few states that offered athletic opportunities to girls subjected them to discriminatory rules like six-on-six half-court basketball or scheduled them in odd seasons so the boys would not have to share their facilities.
The discrimination continued in colleges and universities. Many schools completely barred women from stereotypically male programs like law and medicine. Still others set quotas that limited the number of female students, no matter their qualifications relative to male applicants and students. Many of the nation’s prestigious schools—including even public colleges like the University of Virginia—remained male only. Meanwhile, women in academia were denied tenure or simply not hired because of their gender. The law even allowed public schools to assign female teachers in elementary schools while they hired only males for high school math or science classes. Not even the Equal Protection Clause protects women from these indignities, because the Supreme Court has not yet recognized “sex” as a suspect class entitled to heightened scrutiny.
