De-contextualizing is not good and important practice for biblical interpretation.
Contextualization is the practice of giving meaning as a method of analyzing the setting in which a message or action is carried out in the domain of Bible translation and interpretation. Contextualization is a method of analyzing Bible interpretations in connection to their cultural contexts.
So, the given statement is false.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/2816100?referrer=searchResults
The argument he used was that because he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal, he could never again be enslaved. This was a doctrine that was recognized in common law for centuries in Europe.
The U-boat substantially reduced shipping capabilities of the allied powers
In the 1992 election, president Bush found himself on the defensive against Bill Clinton and Ross Perot largely because of criticisms of his management of :
B. the U.S economy
Hope this helps
Answer:
1. equality and economic justice through socialism
2. a gradual decline in the government providing education and healthcare
3. shared resources and cooperation among people
Explanation:
I know 1. equality and economic justice through socialism and 3. shared resources and cooperation among people are correct... and that <em>5. private ownership of the means of production</em> is <u>INCORRECT</u>... and with a communist society, it depends on there being an all powerful and dictating government of sorts so it wouldn't be <em>4. a gradual decline in the need for a government </em>so that leaves 2.
