Answer:
The five-year plans resulted in a very low agricultural community, which caused widespread famine and death among the peasants.
Explanation:
The Soviet Union imposed the collectivization of its agricultural sector between 1928 and 1940 during the rise of Joseph Stalin. This collectivization was made through the five-year plans, which represented a policy aimed at consolidating individual properties and labor in collective farms.
The Soviet leadership hoped that replacing individual peasant farms with collective ones would immediately increase the supply of food for the urban population, the supply of raw materials for the processing industry, and agricultural exports.
Planners regarded collectivization as the solution to the agricultural distribution (especially grain delivery) crisis that began in 1927. This problem worsened as the Soviet Union advanced its ambitious industrialization program.
Despite expectations, collectivization led to a catastrophic fall in agricultural productivity, which did not return to levels reached by the NEP until 1940. In the early years of collectivization, it was estimated that industrial production would increase by 200% and agricultural production by 50%. But those expectations were not met. Agricultural productivity was very low, causing a major crisis in the country's countryside, causing widespread famine and death among several peasants.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
Copyright is defined as the property low in which protection of the creative works is done legally.It is implemented on art, sculptures, music, movies, etc which are originally made by the authorship.It restricts anyone from copying or imitating the original artistic work apart from the original maker of that work or without the permission of the maker.
According to the question , Dylan has violated the copyright of Lydia.Dylan liked the drawing of Lydia and thus made a photocopy of it but he did not take acknowledgement or permission from Lydia. In this way the copied drawing Dylan made is illegal work and against the copyright act.
According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
Answer:
Curley's wife, like the other players in the drama, is simply a character type ... Of Mice and Men ... George and Candy call her by other names such as "jailbait" or "tart. ... her beauty is her power, and she uses it to flirt with the ranch hands and make ... the reader to dislike her and see her as the downfall of the men in the story
Answer:
The state is good when the people in it are good. In any country government and its governance plays a very vital role in giving shape to the future of that country but there is a huge difference between good and bad governance.
Explanation:
Hope it will help you
