1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
3 years ago
7

Why did Parliament repeal the Stamp Act?

History
1 answer:
Alja [10]3 years ago
6 0
A . Colonial boycotts hurt British trade
You might be interested in
3. PART A: What is the meaning of “culmination” in paragraph 1? A complete collapse B a disagreement C final result D violent in
Semmy [17]

Answer:

I have no clue what paragraph 1 says, but I know this much: The culmination is the end point or final stage of something you've been working toward or something that's been building up. The culmination of your high school career, for example, should be graduation day — and probably not prom night. A culmination isn't just the conclusion.

Explanation:

Hope this helps, if not then sorry for wasting your time and points!

4 0
3 years ago
What did Plymouth suffered from?
Lorico [155]

Answer:

scurvy and pneumonia caused by a lack of shelter in the cold, wet weather.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why was Nuremberg selected as the site for war crime trials after World War II?
Anika [276]
C. It was home to the Nazi Party and the anti-Semitic Nuremberg laws.

It was considered the birthplace of the Nazi party, and had many Nazi rallies to inspire people to vote Hitler into office. Also it was the passing of Nuremberg laws by the Reich-stag that played a factor too.
6 0
3 years ago
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
Why is the holy land important for christianity
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

it is the birth place of christ

Explanation:

christ is important

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What plan for the south did president lincoln start working on before the civil war had endend?
    6·2 answers
  • Plz help, its easy !!!<br> Will give brainliest
    5·2 answers
  • A major impact of the 24th amendment banning poll taxes and of the 1965 voting rights act was the
    8·1 answer
  • What aspect of society did the counterculture of the 1960s reject?
    10·1 answer
  • What was Socrates's approach to seeking knowledge, and why did some of his fellow Athenians find it controversial?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the battle of el alamein in egypt​
    10·1 answer
  • ? What agricultural technique did the Olmec use to
    8·1 answer
  • What types of persecution did the Roma face before, during, and after the Holocaust?
    8·1 answer
  • The Alamo – identify or answer the following (p263-265)
    12·1 answer
  • what makes a movement successful?? i need 4 paragraphs + a conclusion. will mark brainliest &amp; no plagiarism please.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!