In many ways, Pyrrhus is a foil to Hamlet. For example, Pyrrhus is impulsive and rash, while Hamlet is contemplative and indecisive.
What is Pyrrhus?
Pyrrhus was a Hellenistic-era Greek king and statesman. He was the Aeacid royal house's king of the Greek Molossians tribe before succeeding to the throne of Epirus. He was regarded as being one of the greatest generals in ancient times and was one of early Rome's strongest adversaries. He suffered intolerably high losses in a number of his victories, giving rise to the phrase "Pyrrhic victory." 13-year-old Pyrrhus had become king of Epirus in 306 BC, but Cassander overthrew him four years later. He participated in the Diadochi Wars before being helped by Ptolemy I Soter to retake his throne in 297 BC. In the course of what became known as the Pyrrhic War,
Additionally, Pyrrhus is vengeful and driven by a desire for revenge, while Hamlet is more concerned with justice. Finally, Pyrrhus is single-minded in his pursuit of his goals, while Hamlet is easily distracted.
To learn more about Pyrrhus
brainly.com/question/5617546
#SPJ4
Chicago , conocida coloquialmente como «la Segunda Ciudad» o «la Ciudad de los Vientos», es la tercera ciudad con mayor número de habitantes en Estados Unidos , detrás de Nueva York y Los Ángeles .
Chicago se encuentra en el estado de Illinois , a lo largo de la costa suroeste del lago Míchigan , y es la sede del condado de Cook .
Forma parte del área metropolitana de Chicago , una conurbación integrada además por los condados periféricos.
Both nations did not want to fight directly because of the threat of a nuclear Holocaust, They were the most powerful nations that spread influence and dominance to surrounding countries and fighting them directly would have started another World war.
I believe the answer is: <span>They used steel plows and other new forms of technology.
Prior to this invention, the farmers only rely on the buffalo's step or manual hooes to process the field and left the part where the soil composition is too hard to process. This of course resulted in lower amount of production that the farmers obtain per area of their farms.</span>
Answer:
Sorry if this doesnt help But A seems least logical
Explanation:
Pls Dont mark me brainliest i dont deserve it
