1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitriy789 [7]
3 years ago
9

which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid? a. confirming that it is not an online

source b. checking its conclusions against other sources c. determining whether or not it is well-known d. determining whether it is a secondary source
History
2 answers:
nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
6 0

<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.

<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.

<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.

So the answer is:

b. checking its conclusions against other sources

The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.



Step2247 [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

b. checking its conclusions against other sources

Explanation:

I took the quiz and it was correct :)

You might be interested in
What was one contributing factor to the growth of medieval towns and cities?
Trava [24]
B
..........................
6 0
4 years ago
What did northerners think about the compromise of 1850
iren2701 [21]
Northerners claimed the law was unfair. The flagrant violation of the Fugitive Slave Law set the scene for the tempest that emerged later in the decade. But for now, Americans hoped against hope that the fragile peace would prevail.
3 0
3 years ago
How did political conflict in the Mughal empire eventually result in the British takeover of India?
Eva8 [605]
Basically, the conflict in the Mughal empire  convey to the world how weak the Indian Condition is.
So not long after that, the British and East Indian companies started to spread their influences there.
6 0
4 years ago
The composition of a nuclide (atomic nucleus) is defined by the number of protons Z and the number of neutrons N, which sum to m
Rudiy27

Answer:

B

Explanation:

I remember the map from history

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Wich of the following economic flourished in the middle colonies ?
Yakvenalex [24]
I think wheat,but im not for sure you might want to get some one else to answer it tho im so sorry.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How would the acceptance of these demands help the supporters of the Populist Party?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the fighting in Iwo Jima and Okinawa affect the Allies' Pacific strategy?
    10·2 answers
  • Por qué se considera la cultura islámica como una cultura de síntesis
    6·1 answer
  • Germany's increase in industrial production in the late-20th century had what unintended result? A) the end of communism B) impe
    11·1 answer
  • How can pottery help us to understand how early people lived?
    13·2 answers
  • Funding for campaigns can come directly from all of the following EXCEPT:
    7·2 answers
  • What is the area along the atlantic ocean formed the 13 original?uhhm​
    15·1 answer
  • Pls help that would be niceeeee!
    6·2 answers
  • The graph shows the number of representatives that Georgia voters have sent to Congress in selected years.
    10·2 answers
  • Why did Congress want to remove Grant?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!