This should be false. Under the articles, the states were acceptably stable. The problem was that the national government its self was weak and had no money as they had no authority to tax the states. This change with the constitution which still keep the states as states but adhered much more to the new, divided government that did have the authority to impose a national tax on states. This also brought a bigger sense of unity within the states over time and the national governments strength would grow over time. Hope this helps or answered the question/statement.<span />
Iit protects against any branch of the government trying to abuse its power. This way all powers are shared and equal. This goes even for the president, he alone cannot mandate orders. It takes approval of branches (judicial, legislative, executive) to get to a deal. :)
Happy New Year!
The first answer
low wages with long hours and harsh conditions
I believe you're looking for manorialism.<span />
The single-party was the party system used by the Russia government after the Communists took power.
<h3>What is a
single-party?</h3>
This is a practice of a state where only one political party has the right to form the government based on the constitution provision.
Hence, after the Communists took power, the constitution allows only for single-party to be used by the Russia government.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about single-party
<em>brainly.com/question/10467613</em>
#SPJ1
