1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bond [772]
3 years ago
9

What role did American politics play in the fighting of the Vietnam War? How would these politics decide the outcome of the conf

lict?
History
1 answer:
Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
4 0
On 12 March 1947, President Harry Truman addressed Congress, hoping to promote U.S. aid to anti-Communist governments in the Middle East and Asia. "At the present moment in world history," President Harry S. Truman proclaimed, "nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life." On the one hand, he explained, the choice is life "based upon the will of the majority," and "distinguished by free institutions, representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty, freedom of speech and religion, and freedom from political oppression." Truman painted the other option—communism—as life in which the will of a few is forcibly inflicted upon the majority. "It relies upon terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio, fixed elections, and the suppression of personal freedom."37

<span>With the end of </span>World War II, the United States and its one-time ally, the Soviet Union, clashed over the reorganization of the postwar world. Each perceived the other as a significant threat to its national security, its institutions, and its influence over the globe. To the United States, the USSR was intent on spreading communism by any means necessary. And with each move made by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin to spread his sphere of influence in order to secure his nation's borders, the U.S. found its fears confirmed.

<span>President Truman, then, thought it vital that the U.S. find ways to strengthen its alliances abroad. The United States must embrace a new, global role, Truman urged, whereby it would befriend nations hostile to the USSR and orchestrate the battle against the growing Communist threat. Congress agreed that the Communist menace </span>must be contained<span> and that American foreign policy should be based on the preservation of those regimes prepared to fight it. Thus, it approved the </span>"Truman Doctrine,"<span> authorizing millions of dollars in military aid, grants to train foreign armies, and the allocation of U.S. military advisors to countries such as Greece, Turkey, and later Vietnam.</span>
You might be interested in
What were two goals of European imperialists?
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

o build European markets for goods from other colonies

to bring Christianity to non-Christians but second is also aprtly correct.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
DjjdjdjxjxjxjxjxjxjDjjdjdjxjxjxjxjxjxj
Kay [80]

Answer:

?

Explanation:

5 0
11 months ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
Based on the lesson and on this quote what was lincoln's hope for future
pychu [463]
Both sides would reconcile and freedom and equality would prevail.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLLZZZ HEELPP FASSTT!!!!!50 POINTS!!!!!!!IF YOU DONT EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWERS OR ANSWER INCORRECTLY, THEN I WILL REPORT YOU!!!!!
Ket [755]
<span>a desire to earn fame and fortune
a goal to gain land for Spain 
</span><span>a desire to find gold for Spain

(more of the top one, but the other 2 was something they accomplished too)

</span><span>C. French traders learned American Indian languages and customs. Spanish settlers did not.
The French traders actually tried to get along with the Indians in good term, while the Spanish.. not so much</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Farmers favored inflation because it would
    7·2 answers
  • What was the major political reason for why the conference gained popularity in the u.s.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a way americans on the home front sacrificed to aid the war effort in world war ll.
    11·2 answers
  • Which is the BEST description of the difference between a republic and a democracy? A) There is no difference between these two
    12·2 answers
  • If the united states bought louisiana from france in 1803 why does this 1763 map show louisiana as spanish territory
    6·2 answers
  • England had enjoyed relative peace and tranquility during the eighty-five years from the founding of Jamestown to the rule of Ge
    11·1 answer
  • 4. Which of the following is true about women's​ lives in the 1800s? * A. Women were allowed to vote. B. Women were expected to
    15·2 answers
  • How did governments pay for the war ww1?
    14·1 answer
  • How were the views of the Democratic Party different than the viewpoints of the Know-Nothing Party?​
    12·1 answer
  • 1. The economy of Texas is the__ largest in the us
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!