Answer:
C. a third variable, such as students' home environment, must have caused students to both drink more non-diet soda and engage in aggressive acts
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about An observational study that was conducted in inner-city Boston approximately four years ago demonstrated that high-school students who consumed more than five cans of non-diet soda every week were between 9 and 15-percent likelier to engage in an aggressive act compared with counterparts who drank less non- diet soda. In this case, we can reliably conclude that a third variable, such as students' home environment, must have caused students to both drink more non-diet soda and engage in aggressive acts.
Observational studies can be regarded as studies whereby
researchers make observation about different effect of factors such as
risk factor, home, as well as environment and diagnostic test that affects the experiment. In observational studies Variables are very crucial, A variable can be anything that that is liable to change, it can change and it can be changed as well. They are factors which the observer can manipulate or control for when carrying out experiments.
Answer:
Social learning and psychodynamic
Explanation:
The psychodynamic perspective provides an explanation from the a sex and death instinct in the unconscious mind of humans. Social learning on the other hand emphasizes on social situations. From the example, the aspect of trying to recognizing herself as a female and trying to become a skilled one demonstrates psychodynamic approach. Emulating her mother and older sister is an act of social learning.
Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
I think the answer is B or C
The correct answer for the given question above would be option B. The one that might happen if an economy is unable to produce wanted goods and services is that, <span>people will look elsewhere for them. Since it is a want, people have the urge of acquiring it, so the only way they can do that is to look elsewhere. Hope this answer helps.</span>
