Answer:
it's the third one
Explanation:
the immagrants flocked over and filled the place
Answer:
While both New England and Chesapeake were settled by people of English origin both communities gradually developed on a different scale, not only because of their different geography and basic economics but also because of the kind of people who settled there.
Explanation:
New England was mostly settled by a group of families who came with young children to start a new life. Their aim was to find a safe place to raise their families, away from the religious persecution of Europe.
On the other hand, Chesapeake consisted mostly of single men and people who were seeking a way to make a fortune.
New England also did not offer the same agriculture opportunities. As large-scale farming was difficult, most people relied on timber, fishing and other such means to earn a source of income.
Chesapeake was a rich agriculture land where rice and tobacco could be grown in abundance.
By the mid-1600s, news of large parts of abundant land in the New World had reached England and many young men were trying to make a new life.
By the 1700s, both areas had become thriving communities.
All this gradually gave rise to a very difficult culture in both communities.
Answer:
An apparent memory of an event that did not actually happen, unconsciously constructed to fill a gap.
Explanation:
An aging population will need a pension when they stop working and medical treatments which can be costly.
