1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Schach [20]
3 years ago
12

The death penalty's deterrent effect has been reduced to nothing in recent years and, thus, does not show up in the research bec

ause it has not been imposed often or quickly enough to have the desired effect.
True/False
Social Studies
2 answers:
Blababa [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Most people believe that, the death penalty does not have any deterrent effect on crime rates and there is no clear research suggesting that it does.

This can be<u> attributed to the length of time between death penalty cases</u>, with the <em>last case in the United states occuring as far back as 2003.</em>

If the death penalty was to be meted out on a more regular basis, then it would probably deter people from committing crimes.

Gemiola [76]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct option is<em> True</em>

Explanation:

It is true because most crimes that attract " the Death Penalty," are few and does not always show up. Criminals who commit crimes that attract death penalty are extremely smart and careful people who apply due diligence in all their criminal acts to ensure that they are not easily caught in the act. They apply caution and clean traces to avoid been traced to their acts. They avert avoidable risks and apply counter technologies to escape the net of security operatives.

However, the death penalty as a deterrent does not stop the perpetration of such crime but makes the criminal recalcitrant.

You might be interested in
How will you know which information to include to in your arguement to support your claim/
Reil [10]
When constructing an argumentative essay, incorporate sources that are or are close to irrefutable and have relevance to what you are discussing. For example, if your topic is about why sanitary napkins for women should be free at school then present facts about how not everyone has access to them at home or how the expense would not cost a lot. However, no matter what you say it can not be opinion driven and you must have valir reasons and statistics to support your point. So using the previous topic, I would mention the actual estimated price free sanitary napkins would cost or talk about the struggles of teenage girls or teachers who cannot afford tampons. Additionally in your argumentative essay, you will need a counterclaim which is you rebuting a popular misconception or a common opposing viewpoint. For example, one may mention how female students and faculty would abuse the privilege and would not use it for only emergencies. They would then combat the statement by highlighting how many schools that do offer free sanitary napkins obtained a specific system that allows them to monitor who is borrowing what and the quantity of how much they borrow by making the pads accessible at the nurse or the administration office. You will know if something supports your claim if the evidence has the same topic and main idea as your objective and if it does not disprove your belief.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did manufacturers hire children to work in their factories?
tatuchka [14]
Because manufacturers could pay them lower wages, since they were kids
3 0
3 years ago
True or False: The word democracy comes from Greek word, meaning citizens’ power. It’s an idea that was first thought of a long
svlad2 [7]

Answer: True

Explanation: I did the test :)

3 0
3 years ago
While working on the body of your speech, you realize that the steps of the process you just explained are fairly complex. You d
GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

Question

Explanation:

Using a question will hep you reiterate the information while gathering about how well the audience is paying attention.

8 0
3 years ago
Why might socialists oppose to progressive reform in the U.S.
Ivenika [448]
Socialists oppose to progressive reform as they think it as revolutionism.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Choose one of the federal agencies mentioned in section 1, and explain how it acts to limit negative externalities.
    5·1 answer
  • Who is considered the single most powerful person in the american criminal justice system?
    15·1 answer
  • What are Psychologists' involvement in assessments related to death penalty cases
    14·1 answer
  • Which is a factor that helped relaunch the Industrial Revolution in Europe? A. the invention of the automobile for easier travel
    13·1 answer
  • Protectionism uses trade barriers to protect foreign manufacturers from domestic competition.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these amendments is a ratified and current amendment?
    15·1 answer
  • The Shaklee Corporation incorporated which "green" features into the design of their new headquarters in Pleasanton, California?
    14·1 answer
  • Slam began in what the area that is now what country?
    5·1 answer
  • Over the past 80 years, some countries in Southwest Asia have become very wealthy. Other countries have remained fairly poor. Wh
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Reagan believes that the American people deserve the credit for the nation’s success. What evidence from the passage best sup
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!