Most people believe that, the death penalty does not have any deterrent effect on crime rates and there is no clear research suggesting that it does.
This can be<u> attributed to the length of time between death penalty cases</u>, with the <em>last case in the United states occuring as far back as 2003.</em>
If the death penalty was to be meted out on a more regular basis, then it would probably deter people from committing crimes.
It is true because most crimes that attract " the Death Penalty," are few and does not always show up. Criminals who commit crimes that attract death penalty are extremely smart and careful people who apply due diligence in all their criminal acts to ensure that they are not easily caught in the act. They apply caution and clean traces to avoid been traced to their acts. They avert avoidable risks and apply counter technologies to escape the net of security operatives.
However, the death penalty as a deterrent does not stop the perpetration of such crime but makes the criminal recalcitrant.
Mechanical solidarity was developed in Emile Durkheim theory if development of society. Durkheim explains that mechanical solidarity is seen in less technologically developed societies or hunting and gathering societies whereby there is togetherness as a result of shared beliefs, customs, traditions or experiences. This solidarity functions like some sort of internal conscience among 10th else individuals that causes cooperation among them. Mechanical solidarity is opposed to organic solidarity in Durkheim's theory.
The meat grinder in the Korean war was actually a strategy that they used. There were stills combats that were being deployed to the war to fight. And most of the attacks are initiated by one or single combat unit. The attack strength is on the lower left while the defense is on the lower right.
