1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dvinal [7]
3 years ago
8

Which statement about Francisco Pizarro is true? A. He defeated the Maya. B. He executed Inca emperor Atahualpa. C. He destroyed

the Aztec Empire. D. He converting the Aztecs to Christianity.
History
1 answer:
aleksley [76]3 years ago
3 0
B      because he was a spanish conquistadore and he came over they thought he was a conqurer god and atahualpa was a horribal person frenquent sacrefices on his people francisco killed him only cause he got the civilians on hs side to help him so the answer is b he executes inca emperor atahualpa            

HOPE THIS HELPS!

You might be interested in
How does the law of supply and demand influence the decision of when a movie is released
Savatey [412]
is an economic theory that explains how supply and demand are related to each other and how that relationship affects the price of goods and services. It's a fundamental economic principle that when supply exceeds demand for a good or service, prices fall. When demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Roman Empire split into two territories in 286 CE?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Diocletian was correct, the empire was too large to be ruled by a single man and needed at least 2 emperors to control both the East and Western half, the Eastern half had enemies such as the Sassanids and Balkan tribes to deal with while the Western half had Germanic Incursions to deal with

4 0
3 years ago
Why was bismarck eager to gain control over the territories of Alsace and Lorraine?
Ray Of Light [21]
One of the main reasons why Bismarck wanted to control the territories of Alsace and Lorraine was mostly because both territories were plentiful and useful territories to have in any country as they were quite developed. It was also good for strategic reasons. 
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Plessy v. Ferguson ruling stated that
horrorfan [7]
First answer.
 the 14th amendment was for freedom.
the others don't make too much sense because the guy was for civil rights. hope this helped :) 
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Agglomeration
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How have social reform movements bolstered other social reform movements?
    13·1 answer
  • The Church protected women and fined men who?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the companies control the government of their colonies?
    15·2 answers
  • Genghis khan United the Mongols and built an Empire by combining
    11·2 answers
  • What effect did trade controlled by Imperial leaders have.
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Second Punic Wars end?
    14·2 answers
  • What is Imperialism? Why did nations engage in this practice?
    9·1 answer
  • What are three events that occurred during Washington's terms in office?
    9·1 answer
  • How did economic reforms in turkey in the late 1900s improve the turkish economy?.
    7·2 answers
  • Origins: 200,000 years ago
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!