Answer: company’s direct labor budget = $320000
Explanation:
Given that,
Standard hourly labor rate in the Cutting Department = $12
It takes 30 minutes of direct labor time to cut the lumber
Tables take one hour to assemble
Standard hourly rate in the Assembly Department = $10
Lunchco’s production budget = 20,000
Cutting Department = production budget × direct labor time × Standard hourly labor rate
= 20000 × 0.5 hours/unit × $12/unit
= $120000
Assembly Department = production budget × Tables take one hour to assemble × Standard hourly labor rate
= 20000 × 1 hour/unit × $10/unit
= $200000
Therefore,
company’s direct labor budget = Assembly Department + Cutting Department
= 200000 + 120000
= $320000
Answer: d. mike cannot disaffirm because he has already ratified the contract
Explanation:
When signing deals it's important to consider long term, this helps to make the best decision in any and most scenario. Most deals signed too cannot be reversed or change or adjusted because it'll affect the policy of the organization and won't be health for them. Mike has agreed to buy a property through a spread payment plan, changing the deal now after some years will not be possible as it distorts the plan intially agreed and goes against the policy of the organization selling the home.
The answer is the 3rd one.
My explanation would be that the other reasons listed are for personal use such as friends birthdays, music, and a new clock, but the third answer is listing things appropriate for a business.
Hope I helped !
Answer:
Opportunity cost
Explanation:
A country is said to have a comparative advantage in producing a good, if it has a lower opportunity cost of producing that good in comparison to the other country. For instance if the opportunity cost of producing Wheat in U.S is 2. While that in China is 1. It shows that China has a comparative advantage in producing wheat as compared to the U.S.
So a nation that has a comparative advantage in producing a good or service compared to the other nation can produce that good or service with a lower opportunity cost.
Efficiency, Profit and Resource cost are not directly related to comparative advantage. Although efficiency can contribute towards lower opportunity cost but it is not a scale used for international trade.
Thus, lower opportunity cost is the best alternative.
