Answer:
National service provider (NSP)
Regional service provider (RSP)
Internet service provider (ISP)
Explanation:
National service providers (NSP) are companies that own the internet backbone infrastructure which other second party internet service providers can link to. Examples of NSPs are Orange, Sprint, AT&T etc.
It typically provides fibre optic cables and core routers which the ISPs link to in order to provide internet exchange for the customers.
Regional service provider (RSP) are basically ISPs operating within a region. Unlike ISPs, they cover only defined regions. Examples are New England's NEARNet which provides internet access for residents of New England and the San Francisco Bay area BARNet for San Francisco Bay resident.
Internet service provider (ISP) are the direct link to the customers. Many NSPs also act as ISPs by using routers that can transfer network from the backbone network exchange to the receiving equipment of the end users such as mobile phones, computers etc. Examples of ISPs are AT&T, Comcast and Verizon.
Answer:
Im not understanding your question at the moment. Please explain the question or assignment task(directions)
Explanation:
Explanation:
a).
Modus ponens: Some wars are just. So, pacifism must be false.
Modus tollens: Pacifism is always false. Thus, some wars are just.
b).
Modus ponens: God is in his heaven. Hence, all is right with the world.
Modus tollens: All is right across the world. So, God must be in his heaven.
c).
Modus ponens: Lino has admitted to all the charges. Hence, he must be telling the truth.
Modus tollens: Lino tells the truth. So, he must have admitted to his charges.
Answer:
Internal; hard work
Explanation:
Locus of control refers to the degree to which people believe that they have control over their own lives. A locus of control is characterized as internal if the person believes that they can control their own life or external if they believe that life is controlled by outside factors which they cannot influence. In this example, college students with an internal locus of control did better academically, and were also more likely to associate their academic success with hard work.
In England, the king appointed judges and could remove them at will, so judges had strong incentives to issue rulings that pleased the king to keep their jobs.
The Framers of the Constitution instead wanted an independent judiciary able to act as a buffer against an oppressive legislature or executive. As Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist 78, the Framers granted federal judges life tenure to protect them from undue political influence: “In a monarchy it is an excellent barrier to the despotism of the prince; in a republic it is a no less excellent barrier to the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body.”
Life tenure is intended to allow judges to issue rulings that go against the majority or ruling elite without fear of retribution. And these protections are necessary: Federal judges routinely rule on the most important and controversial issues of the day and consider whether state and federal laws are constitutional, raising claims of “countermajoritarian” behavior by scholars and politicians alike.
Public criticism of judicial decisions is also nothing new: Newly inaugurated President Thomas Jefferson vehemently derided the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, perhaps the most consequential Supreme Court decision, which ultimately established the power of judicial review, or the ability of courts to strike down laws as unconstitutional. Jefferson even tried to block the court from ruling on the case by canceling the court’s June 1802 term.
President Barack Obama famously criticized the justices of the Supreme Court for their ruling in Citizens United v. FEC while they sat silently at the 2010 State of the Union.
<em>Hope it helps </em>
.... Pls mark brainliest
