For information to be classified, it is important that such information should concern military plans, weapon systems, or operations.
It should be noted that a valid reason to classify information is to protect national security. This is vital in order to safeguard lives and properties.
Information can be classified if it is owned by the United States government. Its unauthorized disclosure can lead to the damage of natural security and when it concerns weapon systems, military plans, or operations.
Learn more about information classification on:
brainly.com/question/25818030
I am thinking the answer is D) The Texas Revolution started after the Mexican government attempted to keep the oil discovered for itself rather than for the use of the people of Texas.
Constructing his identity as he has been wondering who he really is, thinking about his values, and pondering the direction he will pursue in the future he is constructing identity.
More about constructing identity:
Identity construction is a complex process in which humans develop a distinct and distinct view of themselves and their identity.
Identity construction is closely related to self-concept, personality development, and values. Individuation is also an important aspect of identity formation. Continuity and inner unity are essential for healthy identity formation, whereas disruptions in either can be interpreted and labelled as abnormal development.
Complete Question:
Sixteen-year-old Max has been introspective lately. He has been wondering who he really is, thinking about his values, and pondering the direction he will pursue in the future. Max is
(a)considering a moral dilemma
(b)adopting his parents' values as his own
(c)constructing his identity
(d)building his
Learn more about identity development here:
brainly.com/question/1452486
#SPJ4
Answer:
Congressional districts must have roughly equal populations if this is feasible.
In an opinion authored by Hugo L. Black, the 6-3 majority held that the district court had jurisdiction because debasement of the right to vote as a result of a state congressional apportionment law was justiciable and not subject to dismissal for "want of equity." The Court further held that the apportionment statute was invalid because it abridged the requirement of Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution that The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states, and the electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature.
Justice Clark concurred in part and dissented in part. He agreed with the majority that the trial court erred in dismissing the case for nonjusticiability and want of equity, but stated further that Article 1, section 2, does not forbid disproportionate congressional districts and that the case should be remanded for a hearing to determine whether the apportionment statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justice Harlan dissented on the ground that the Constitution expressly provides that state legislatures and Congress have exclusive jurisdiction over problems of congressional apportionment of the type involved in the case.
Justice Stewart stated that he joined with Mr. Justice Harlan's dissent except insofar as there might be implied in that dissent the view that the issues were not justiciable.
Explanation: