Answer: She failed to look at the data objectively by trying to get a desired result.
The situation shows that the scientist already has some expected result in mind probably the experiment is done only to validate his assumptions however, when he did not get it right the first time he deviate from the scientific method and failed to treat the data objectively.
According to climate change scientists, the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and the like) results in the releasing of carbon dioxide atoms into the atmosphere, which can cloud the atmosphere, obscuring sunlight, as well as deplete the ozone layer, resulting in an increase in global temperature. This change could potentially cause some cooler temperature-loving species to either migrate in search of cooler locations or possibly die out if they are unable to move (biosphere). It could also cause water levels in some areas to decrease due to evaporation, or increase due to the releasing of water into the oceans resulting from the melting of our polar ice caps (hydrosphere).
Hope that helped! =)
Answer:
Explanation:
A tissue is a group of similar cells that work together to do a particular job. For example, most animals have muscle tissues, which are made up of muscle cells.
Answer:
Changes in abiotic factors, or Lack of available mates after the flood. If one answer had to be chosen, choose "lack of available mates"
Explanation:
New competition by displaced animals can not be an answer due to the possibility that there is little to no food left, and floods do not have the ability to displace animals. A decrease in predators would usually lead to a greater population, so this answer does not work. An increase in living space would also lead to an increase in population, so this answer is incorrect. A lack of available mates work as an answer because populations depend on genetic diversity and a large selection of mates in order to grow their population. Changes in abiotic factors can mean a lack of certain resources that could be shelter.
Answer:
Your cells would have molecules from air, but would not get enough molecules from food. Both are needed for cellular respiration
Explanation:
