Answer:
Manifest destiny was a widely held cultural belief in the 19th-century United States that American settlers were destined to expand across North America. Historians have emphasized that "manifest destiny" was a contested concept Democrats endorsed the idea but many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs) rejected it. Historian Daniel Walker Howe writes, "American imperialism did not represent an American consensus; it provoked bitter dissent within the national polity … Whigs saw America's moral mission as one of democratic example rather than one of conquest."
Explanation:
sorry po kung mali pa brainliest nalang po :D
The loyalists believed that the patriots were in fact traitors to the Crown since they were rebelling against Great Britain. The loyalists saw no problem with the way Britain was treating the colonies.
What did Themistokles believe about the Persian defeat at Marathon?It was only the prelude to a greater struggle.When did the Persian Empire dominate the international political scene?For the 300 years from mid 6th century until it's conquest by Alexander of Macedon.Where could the influence of the Persian Empire be found?Both in the foreign policies of Greek states and in their own internal disputesExplain the formation of the Delian league.A direct result of the Greek conflict with Persia and the war proposed by Philip and carried out by Alexander.Explain the cultural impact of Darius and Xerxes invasion of Greece?The subject/background of some of the most celebrated works of Greek literature (such as histories of Herodotes and some plays of Aischylos)How is Persia usually characterized and how was this view developed?<span>A typical "Oriental" despotic monarchy. Developed partly as an 18th + 19th Century Western European response to what constituted "Oriental".</span>
Ending slavery means it will stop for sure, mean while ending the slavery trade means you won't be making more trades but slavery still exist.
Hope this helps! :)