Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
Try doing them in different coloured gel pens so that they stand out and maybe circle some of your note :)
Answer:
When Louie was in Germany, he lost his hope for once and his power to compete has come to an end when he was facing some looming defeats at sudden speed. He was was not able to think or move normally because he spend most of his time in eating and not working on his ship. But when he began start working again, he touched the glories of success. Moreover he also showed examples of mischief when he stole the flag of German Chancellery.
I hope the answer is clear.
Explanation:
My reaction to this quote is that Abraham Lincoln is referring to the ideal that once people have power they tend to abuse it for their advantage, and personal gain. For Example, gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the manipulation of the county sizing and grouping in states by the Legislative branch to guarantee their reelection into federal or state offices. A typically Democratic city perhaps may be grouped or redrawn to conjoin with a vastly Republican populated area, creating a larger group of supporters of one party, and a polarized county.
