C. a negative duration on it's assets.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
3.55 years
Explanation:
The payback period is the length of time it takes for Beyer Company to recoup the initial investment of $370,000.
In other words, the number of years for the net cash flows of the project to equate the initial investment amount of $370,000 as shown in the attached excel file for Beyer company's payback computation
Answer:
Hence, the net income earned or net loss incurred by the business during the year $102,340.
Explanation:
