Some of the possible solutions which a person can make use of in the case that his rights are violated are:
- Redress in court
- Informal negotiations
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the inalienable rights which an individual enjoys and cannot be tampered with except in special cases where the peace needs to be kept.
Some of the human rights includes:
- Right to life
- Right to ownership of property
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom to peaceful assembly
With this in mind, we can see that seeking redress in court is the most popular way so that the court can determine that your right was actually violated and make a legal ruling or to make use of informal negotiations in civil situations such as demanding an apology and in some cases, compensation.
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/10080939
Answer:
In the area of "reapportionment"
Explanation:
Budgetary accountability was the benchmark of the Bellmon administration. On account of his position on sales taxes, he attempted to build up the state budget. The new chief executive particularly confronted issues in financing the state's schooling division. Bellmon accepted that cuts and revamping in training could set aside cash. Teachers, nonetheless, clamored for a salary increment, and both the Oklahoma Education Association and the National Education Association voted sanctions against the state.
In 1965 the council increased teacher's salaries through increment in cigarette taxes and an expansion in the valuation of foreseen state income.
Quite possibly the most problems that are begging to be addressed standing up to Bellmon included reapportionment of the governing body, which was overwhelmed by meagerly populated provincial territories.
The U.S. High Court settled the issue by deciding that the state must be divided by populace. A completely reallocated assembly met in January 1965 with 33% of the solons coming from Oklahoma and Tulsa regions.
Answer: Adam Smith
Scottish philosopher Adam Smith (1723-1790) was strongly critical of the economic system that prevailed in his era. Smith criticized what he called the "mercantile system" because it restricted trade and thus restricted economic growth. The mercantile system believed the wealth of the world was a fixed amount, measured primarily in gold and silver accumulated. The system promoted a nation selling its products abroad but not needing to buy from others, or imposing heavy tariffs if importing anything. Colonies were created to provide raw materials and resources to the mother country and a market for the mother country's products. Commerce was heavily controlled by the government through charters granted to specific trading companies.
Adam Smith countered by advocating a free market -- the opportunity individual businessmen and for all nations to increase their wealth by exchanging goods freely with one another according to what would become known as capitalist principles. We also speak of <em>"laissez-faire"</em> ("let go") as a term for this sort of free-market economy, set free from government controls. This term came from a French group of thinkers called the Physiocrats (meaning "rule by nature') who were working during the same 18th century era as Smith. The Physiocrats and Smith were in agreement about getting government out of the business of controlling business.
Answer:
Hi !
Here is your answer !
The ten percent plan gave a general pardon to all Southerners except highs ranking Confederate government and military leaders; required 10 percent of the 1860 voting population in the former rebel states to take a binding oath of future allegiance to the United States and the emancipation of slaves; and declared that once those voters took those oaths, the restored Confederate states would draft new state constitutions
[Sorry,but there is no explanation for this question]
Thank You !
