Answer:
Texas shared the position of other slave states regarding the future of new territories and new states. It wanted the expansion of slavery. Southern states advocated a popular sovereignty solution, that is, new states to be admitted to the Union should choose by themselves. The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was a political compromise. Nevertheless, Texas had important objections. In a speech in the Senate delivered on February 15, 1854, Texan leader Sam Houston lists two important obstacles: Nebraska had a too small population in order to sustain organization , and Kansas was a land with very few white settlers and entirely occupied by Native tribes.
Explanation:
I’d like to say that it would be probably A
Answer:
Legislative.
Explanation:
1) divergent and concurrent aren't types of power or part of the branch of government.
2) The excetuive branch is where the president lies because he is the most important branch
3) Leaving legislative as your only option because it allows the state to control some things on their means.
Answer:
I remember that she was interested in how the world would be later on? But I am not for certain. I have a copy of the book but It's just been a while since I read it.
True.
After WW1 ended, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was broken down into seperate states, including Austria, Hungary, etc.
hope this helps
