- We know the answer is not A, because you generally do not want to support meat for a vegetarian publication.
- We know the answer is not B, because triple chocolate donuts have nothing to due with "Muscle Builders Weekly."
- We know the answer in not C, because you are probably not looking for dating ads if you are already married.
- The answer is D, because it is reasonable to explain pet grooming for a publication for pet lovers.
I believe the answer is B. Hope this helped!
-Twixx
If taking about a magazine article, the most suitable option would be option <span>3"suggestions for reducing carbon footprints". In general, this type of articles develops lighter content in comparison to other articles. So the topic should be easy reading and understanding. In the case of 1 and 2, the information that can be provided could be more technical or specific connected to the topic. And the final option would be considered a topic to introduce and then develop. </span>
B, because it doesn't exactly quicken as in a, no odd characters are introduced, and these not really any details we need to know that are left out. I picked B because there are intentionally larger words.
The closest approach is that <u>the student is qualifying the author's claim</u>. <em>Because it simplifies the author's argument with the example of cable TV channels and makes it clear that television affects Americans' lives when it comes to politics</em>. It is enough to see the number of networks devoted to political updates. <em>The student collaborated with new elements like a real example for reflection to prove the author's point of view.</em>