Answer:
because they put in the time and effort to write the book
Everyday homework i believe is not necessary because if the student is not picking up the subject or assignment in class if they bring it home and don’t ask for help they will learn how to do it wrong or not understand it at all. it is really hard to relearn something so i believe it’s easier for the teacher to teach the whole entire class and maybe doing an assignment in class to make sure everyone gets it and if they don’t the teachers can help them and make sure they truly understand it before giving out a test
Answer:
Third Option: Anne Frank and her family go into hiding in the cramped attic of a warehouse for two agonizing years to escape the horrors of Nazi occupation in Amsterdam.
Explanation:
Objective means something which is tangible, measurable, and concrete. If statement(s) includes something which is based on perceptions, interpretations, emotions opinions etc., it will become subjective.
First statement has many subjective phrases, e.g <em>timeless story, perceptive recounting, living in hiding</em> (with no mention of place). So, it is subjective statement and not objective.
Second option has subjective phrases e.g <em>unusual insight</em><em>, </em><em>thoughts and experiences.</em>
Fourth option has subjective phrases e.g <em>thoughts and experiences, living in hiding (with no mention of place)</em>.
Third option had no subjective phrases and everything/fact told is objective i.e <em>Anne Frank and her family, cramped attic of a warehouse, for two agonizing years</em>. So, this option is correct as objective summary.
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
